Power Rankings, Predictors and more!

2023 Week 1 CFB Box Score Analysis

Football

The chart below is taking a look at the previous week’s box scores and showing who may have overachieved or underachieved based on stats. The program generates an “expected” margin of victory, using actual final game stats, and compares that to the:

1. Las Vegas line (pre-game prediction) 2. Actual margin of victory

So if a team meets or exceeds pre game expectations, by the actual play on the field, they are rewarded. However if they win or lose and are statistically dominated this program will show that.

Key: 1. ATS– Against the spread.

2. Act. Yds vs Act. Spread –How each team did using their yardage stats and turnovers.

3. Game should’ve been.. — A scoring projection based on total yards gained using yards per point.

4. Win Margin—Final game margin.

5. Yds/TO spread conv.— A spread projection using total yards gained/allowed and turnovers.

6. Game tot—Acutal game total.

7. Yppt. Total—A total projection of how many points should’ve been scored based on yards.

8. W/L Projection—An estimation of the final score using actual yards and turnover margin. 9. Margin—A number each team “should’ve” won/loss by.

10. Actual Yds—Total yards gained in the game by the offense. 11. Score should’ve been..—A projection for a score based on the game stats and turnovers.

12. TO—Adjusted TO based on actual and pre-game projection.

13. Next Week—A computer generated suggestion for how a team may do next week. (Good, Bad, Play, Fade)

Good—Played as they were projected to do in the game.

Bad—Played below expectations for the game.

Fade—Played well below expectations for the game.

Play—Played better than final score and should be looked at next week.

(Good/Bad/Fade/Play are just suggestions to look at as a guide. Don’t just automatically use them as they are listed. They are to be used to help not as a magic formula)

NEW!! Post game win expectancy numbers below the box score analysis. It shows pre-game expectation (vs the predicted spread), actual final margin, and post-game win expectancy factoring in all of the box score stats.

Team Final Score Act. yds vs act. spread Game should’ve been.. Actual Margin Post game margin Closing Total Closing Spread Post game W/L Projection Margin
FLA 11.00 Better than predicted Higher Scoring 13 -4.72 44.5 5.50 Should have won by 4.72
UTAH 24.00 Worse than predicted Higher Scoring -13 4.72 44.5 -5.50 Should have lost by 4.72
Team Post game total Actual Points Scored OFF Plays Actual Yds Score should’ve been.. TO Adjusted TO 1st Downs Next Week
FLA 42.34 35 65.00 346 23.53 1 0.54 17.00 PLAY
UTAH 42.34 35 53.00 270 18.81 0 0.00 14.00 FADE
Team ATS Rush Att Rushing Yards Comp-Att Passing Yards Yards per pass Yards per play 3rd Down EFF Penalties
FLA Lost ATS 21 13.00 31-44 333.00 7.6 5.32 1-13 9-46
UTAH Won ATS 30 105.00 15-23 165.00 7.2 5.09 3-13 11-91
Pre game W EXP. Actual Post Game W EXP. Play Fade
FLA 35.918% 19.698% 62.1496% FLA ——
UTAH 64.082% 80.302% 37.8504% —— UTAH
Team Final Score Act. yds vs act. spread Game should’ve been.. Actual Margin Post game margin Closing Total Closing Spread Post game W/L Projection Margin
ELON 17.00 Better than predicted Lower Scoring 20 27.82 53.5 33.50 Should have lost by 27.82
WAKE 37.00 Worse than predicted Lower Scoring -20 -27.82 53.5 -33.50 Should have won by 27.82
Team Post game total Actual Points Scored OFF Plays Actual Yds Score should’ve been.. TO Adjusted TO 1st Downs Next Week
ELON 52.36 54 65.00 251 12.27 2 -0.79 13.00 GOOD
WAKE 52.36 54 65.00 427 40.09 1 1.00 22.00 BAD
Team ATS Rush Att Rushing Yards Comp-Att Passing Yards Yards per pass Yards per play 3rd Down EFF Penalties
ELON Won ATS 29 104.00 21-36 147.00 4.1 3.86 2-16 4-35
WAKE Lost ATS 35 98.00 19-30 329.00 11 6.57 6-13 11-91
Pre game W EXP. Actual Post Game W EXP. Play Fade
ELON 1.402% 9.485% 3.4068% —— ——
WAKE 98.598% 90.515% 96.5932% —— ——
Team Final Score Act. yds vs act. spread Game should’ve been.. Actual Margin Post game margin Closing Total Closing Spread Post game W/L Projection Margin
KENT 6.00 Worse than predicted Higher Scoring 50 62.23 54 35.00 Should have lost by 62.23
UCF 56.00 Better than predicted Higher Scoring -50 -62.23 54 -35.00 Should have won by 62.23
Team Post game total Actual Points Scored OFF Plays Actual Yds Score should’ve been.. TO Adjusted TO 1st Downs Next Week
KENT 79.06 62 68.00 240 8.42 1 -1.92 15.00 BAD
UCF 79.06 62 81.00 723 70.64 3 3.00 32.00 GOOD
Team ATS Rush Att Rushing Yards Comp-Att Passing Yards Yards per pass Yards per play 3rd Down EFF Penalties
KENT Lost ATS 36 95.00 12-32 145.00 4.5 3.53 7-17 4-30
UCF Won ATS 46 389.00 25-35 334.00 9.5 8.93 9-13 11-91
Pre game W EXP. Actual Post Game W EXP. Play Fade
KENT 1.086% 0.052% 0.0022% —— ——
UCF 98.914% 99.948% 99.9978% —— ——
Team Final Score Act. yds vs act. spread Game should’ve been.. Actual Margin Post game margin Closing Total Closing Spread Post game W/L Projection Margin
URI 35.00 Better than predicted Lower Scoring 7 0.48 61.5 18.00 Should have lost by 0.48
GAST 42.00 Worse than predicted Lower Scoring -7 -0.48 61.5 -18.00 Should have won by 0.48
Team Post game total Actual Points Scored OFF Plays Actual Yds Score should’ve been.. TO Adjusted TO 1st Downs Next Week
URI 65.29 77 75.00 520 32.40 2 0.50 22.00 GOOD
GAST 65.29 77 58.00 424 32.89 0 0.00 20.00 BAD
Team ATS Rush Att Rushing Yards Comp-Att Passing Yards Yards per pass Yards per play 3rd Down EFF Penalties
URI Won ATS 35 112.00 24-40 408.00 10.2 6.93 13-20 9-70
GAST Lost ATS 38 231.00 16-20 193.00 9.7 7.31 6-12 11-91
Pre game W EXP. Actual Post Game W EXP. Play Fade
URI 11.893% 32.311% 48.7341% —— ——
GAST 88.107% 67.689% 51.2659% —— ——
Team Final Score Act. yds vs act. spread Game should’ve been.. Actual Margin Post game margin Closing Total Closing Spread Post game W/L Projection Margin
SFPA 17.00 Worse than predicted Higher Scoring 18 25.52 58 14.00 Should have lost by 25.52
WMU 35.00 Better than predicted Higher Scoring -18 -25.52 58 -14.00 Should have won by 25.52
Team Post game total Actual Points Scored OFF Plays Actual Yds Score should’ve been.. TO Adjusted TO 1st Downs Next Week
SFPA 56.53 52 46.00 281 15.51 0 -1.17 12.00 BAD
WMU 56.53 52 93.00 509 41.02 1 1.00 29.00 GOOD
Team ATS Rush Att Rushing Yards Comp-Att Passing Yards Yards per pass Yards per play 3rd Down EFF Penalties
SFPA Lost ATS 22 51.00 14-24 230.00 9.6 6.11 5-12 6-51
WMU Won ATS 67 339.00 18-26 170.00 6.5 5.47 10-17 11-91
Pre game W EXP. Actual Post Game W EXP. Play Fade
SFPA 17.930% 11.893% 4.7150% —— ——
WMU 82.070% 88.107% 95.2850% —— ——
Team Final Score Act. yds vs act. spread Game should’ve been.. Actual Margin Post game margin Closing Total Closing Spread Post game W/L Projection Margin
NCSU 24.00 Worse than predicted Higher Scoring -10 -11.19 47.5 -14.50 Should have won by 11.19
CONN 14.00 Better than predicted Higher Scoring 10 11.19 47.5 14.50 Should have lost by 11.19
Team Post game total Actual Points Scored OFF Plays Actual Yds Score should’ve been.. TO Adjusted TO 1st Downs Next Week
NCSU 45.01 38 72.00 364 28.10 0 0.00 23.00 BAD
CONN 45.01 38 53.00 273 16.91 1 -0.21 15.00 GOOD
Team ATS Rush Att Rushing Yards Comp-Att Passing Yards Yards per pass Yards per play 3rd Down EFF Penalties
NCSU Lost ATS 46 209.00 17-26 155.00 6 5.06 8-15 1-5
CONN Won ATS 26 160.00 14-27 113.00 4.2 5.15 4-12 11-91
Pre game W EXP. Actual Post Game W EXP. Play Fade
NCSU 82.915% 74.400% 76.8524% —— ——
CONN 17.085% 25.600% 23.1476% —— ——
Team Final Score Act. yds vs act. spread Game should’ve been.. Actual Margin Post game margin Closing Total Closing Spread Post game W/L Projection Margin
NEB 10.00 Better than predicted Higher Scoring 3 -5.84 43 7.50 Should have won by 5.84
MINN 13.00 Worse than predicted Higher Scoring -3 5.84 43 -7.50 Should have lost by 5.84
Team Post game total Actual Points Scored OFF Plays Actual Yds Score should’ve been.. TO Adjusted TO 1st Downs Next Week
NEB 37.60 23 56.00 295 21.72 4 3.38 18.00 GOOD
MINN 37.60 23 69.00 251 15.88 1 1.00 20.00 BAD
Team ATS Rush Att Rushing Yards Comp-Att Passing Yards Yards per pass Yards per play 3rd Down EFF Penalties
NEB Won ATS 37 181.00 11-19 114.00 6 5.27 5-11 7-55
MINN Lost ATS 25 55.00 24-44 196.00 4.5 3.64 8-17 11-91
Pre game W EXP. Actual Post Game W EXP. Play Fade
NEB 31.143% 42.202% 64.9115% —— ——
MINN 68.857% 57.798% 35.0885% —— ——
Team Final Score Act. yds vs act. spread Game should’ve been.. Actual Margin Post game margin Closing Total Closing Spread Post game W/L Projection Margin
SDAK 10.00 Worse than predicted Higher Scoring 25 32.25 44.5 27.00 Should have lost by 32.25
MIZ 35.00 Better than predicted Higher Scoring -25 -32.25 44.5 -27.00 Should have won by 32.25
Team Post game total Actual Points Scored OFF Plays Actual Yds Score should’ve been.. TO Adjusted TO 1st Downs Next Week
SDAK 48.31 45 60.00 194 8.03 0 -2.25 14.00 FADE
MIZ 48.31 45 66.00 437 40.28 1 1.00 22.00 PLAY
Team ATS Rush Att Rushing Yards Comp-Att Passing Yards Yards per pass Yards per play 3rd Down EFF Penalties
SDAK Won ATS 35 38.00 15-25 156.00 6.2 3.23 2-13 6-57
MIZ Lost ATS 40 211.00 20-26 226.00 8.7 6.62 6-10 11-91
Pre game W EXP. Actual Post Game W EXP. Play Fade
SDAK 3.832% 5.057% 1.7212% —— SDAK
MIZ 96.168% 94.943% 98.2788% MIZ ——
Team Final Score Act. yds vs act. spread Game should’ve been.. Actual Margin Post game margin Closing Total Closing Spread Post game W/L Projection Margin
UAPB 7.00 Worse than predicted Higher Scoring 35 47.00 52.5 41.00 Should have lost by 47.00
TLSA 42.00 Better than predicted Higher Scoring -35 -47.00 52.5 -41.00 Should have won by 47.00
Team Post game total Actual Points Scored OFF Plays Actual Yds Score should’ve been.. TO Adjusted TO 1st Downs Next Week
UAPB 63.26 49 69.00 252 8.13 1 -2.42 18.00 FADE
TLSA 63.26 49 69.00 517 55.13 3 3.00 26.00 PLAY
Team ATS Rush Att Rushing Yards Comp-Att Passing Yards Yards per pass Yards per play 3rd Down EFF Penalties
UAPB Won ATS 43 102.00 15-26 150.00 5.8 3.65 5-16 4-37
TLSA Lost ATS 49 260.00 16-20 257.00 12.9 7.49 5-9 11-91
Pre game W EXP. Actual Post Game W EXP. Play Fade
UAPB 0.359% 1.086% 0.1029% —— UAPB
TLSA 99.641% 98.914% 99.8971% TLSA ——
Team Final Score Act. yds vs act. spread Game should’ve been.. Actual Margin Post game margin Closing Total Closing Spread Post game W/L Projection Margin
NCAT 6.00 Worse than predicted Higher Scoring 29 34.48 46.5 24.50 Should have lost by 34.48
UAB 35.00 Better than predicted Higher Scoring -29 -34.48 46.5 -24.50 Should have won by 34.48
Team Post game total Actual Points Scored OFF Plays Actual Yds Score should’ve been.. TO Adjusted TO 1st Downs Next Week
NCAT 47.62 41 49.00 163 6.57 0 -2.04 12.00 BAD
UAB 47.62 41 71.00 458 41.05 1 1.00 31.00 GOOD
Team ATS Rush Att Rushing Yards Comp-Att Passing Yards Yards per pass Yards per play 3rd Down EFF Penalties
NCAT Lost ATS 41 147.00 2-8 16.00 2 3.33 4-12 2-10
UAB Won ATS 30 167.00 38-41 291.00 7.1 6.45 8-10 11-91
Pre game W EXP. Actual Post Game W EXP. Play Fade
NCAT 5.408% 2.861% 1.1890% —— ——
UAB 94.592% 97.139% 98.8110% —— ——
Team Final Score Act. yds vs act. spread Game should’ve been.. Actual Margin Post game margin Closing Total Closing Spread Post game W/L Projection Margin
SUU 21.00 Better than predicted Higher Scoring 3 26.46 60.5 34.00 Should have lost by 26.46
ASU 24.00 Worse than predicted Higher Scoring -3 -26.46 60.5 -34.00 Should have won by 26.46
Team Post game total Actual Points Scored OFF Plays Actual Yds Score should’ve been.. TO Adjusted TO 1st Downs Next Week
SUU 46.05 45 49.00 226 9.79 0 -2.83 11.00 GOOD
ASU 46.05 45 65.00 371 36.26 0 0.00 19.00 BAD
Team ATS Rush Att Rushing Yards Comp-Att Passing Yards Yards per pass Yards per play 3rd Down EFF Penalties
SUU Won ATS 31 87.00 9-18 139.00 7.7 4.61 5-13 8-71
ASU Lost ATS 34 135.00 18-31 236.00 7.6 5.71 4-14 11-91
Pre game W EXP. Actual Post Game W EXP. Play Fade
SUU 1.289% 42.202% 4.1338% —— ——
ASU 98.711% 57.798% 95.8662% —— ——
Team Final Score Act. yds vs act. spread Game should’ve been.. Actual Margin Post game margin Closing Total Closing Spread Post game W/L Projection Margin
HOW 23.00 Better than predicted Lower Scoring 10 4.01 55.5 20.00 Should have lost by 4.01
EMU 33.00 Worse than predicted Lower Scoring -10 -4.01 55.5 -20.00 Should have won by 4.01
Team Post game total Actual Points Scored OFF Plays Actual Yds Score should’ve been.. TO Adjusted TO 1st Downs Next Week
HOW 46.92 56 75.00 398 21.45 0 -1.67 21.00 GOOD
EMU 46.92 56 58.00 285 25.47 1 1.00 16.00 BAD
Team ATS Rush Att Rushing Yards Comp-Att Passing Yards Yards per pass Yards per play 3rd Down EFF Penalties
HOW Won ATS 42 204.00 16-33 194.00 5.9 5.31 7-16 11-59
EMU Lost ATS 30 110.00 19-28 175.00 6.3 4.91 5-12 11-91
Pre game W EXP. Actual Post Game W EXP. Play Fade
HOW 9.485% 25.600% 39.6241% —— ——
EMU 90.515% 74.400% 60.3759% —— ——
Team Final Score Act. yds vs act. spread Game should’ve been.. Actual Margin Post game margin Closing Total Closing Spread Post game W/L Projection Margin
CMU 7.00 Worse than predicted Higher Scoring 24 17.55 45 14.00 Should have lost by 17.55
MSU 31.00 Better than predicted Higher Scoring -24 -17.55 45 -14.00 Should have won by 17.55
Team Post game total Actual Points Scored OFF Plays Actual Yds Score should’ve been.. TO Adjusted TO 1st Downs Next Week
CMU 44.77 38 66.00 219 13.61 1 -0.17 19.00 BAD
MSU 44.77 38 64.00 406 31.16 0 0.00 20.00 GOOD
Team ATS Rush Att Rushing Yards Comp-Att Passing Yards Yards per pass Yards per play 3rd Down EFF Penalties
CMU Lost ATS 41 123.00 13-25 96.00 3.8 3.32 3-16 7-75
MSU Won ATS 31 127.00 18-33 279.00 8.5 6.34 5-13 11-91
Pre game W EXP. Actual Post Game W EXP. Play Fade
CMU 17.930% 5.777% 12.4875% —— ——
MSU 82.070% 94.223% 87.5125% —— ——
Team Final Score Act. yds vs act. spread Game should’ve been.. Actual Margin Post game margin Closing Total Closing Spread Post game W/L Projection Margin
M-OH 3.00 Worse than predicted Higher Scoring 35 29.80 45 16.50 Should have lost by 29.80
MIA 38.00 Better than predicted Higher Scoring -35 -29.80 45 -16.50 Should have won by 29.80
Team Post game total Actual Points Scored OFF Plays Actual Yds Score should’ve been.. TO Adjusted TO 1st Downs Next Week
M-OH 51.68 41 49.00 215 10.94 0 -1.38 9.00 BAD
MIA 51.68 41 61.00 493 40.74 1 1.00 26.00 GOOD
Team ATS Rush Att Rushing Yards Comp-Att Passing Yards Yards per pass Yards per play 3rd Down EFF Penalties
M-OH Lost ATS 25 51.00 13-24 164.00 6.8 4.39 2-12 5-49
MIA Won ATS 36 250.00 20-25 243.00 9.7 8.08 3-7 11-91
Pre game W EXP. Actual Post Game W EXP. Play Fade
M-OH 13.963% 1.086% 2.5333% —— ——
MIA 86.037% 98.914% 97.4667% —— ——
Team Final Score Act. yds vs act. spread Game should’ve been.. Actual Margin Post game margin Closing Total Closing Spread Post game W/L Projection Margin
LOU 39.00 Worse than predicted Lower Scoring -5 -1.41 49.5 -7.00 Should have won by 1.41
GT 34.00 Better than predicted Lower Scoring 5 1.41 49.5 7.00 Should have lost by 1.41
Team Post game total Actual Points Scored OFF Plays Actual Yds Score should’ve been.. TO Adjusted TO 1st Downs Next Week
LOU 66.45 73 65.00 474 33.93 1 1.00 21.00 BAD
GT 66.45 73 70.00 488 32.52 2 1.42 23.00 GOOD
Team ATS Rush Att Rushing Yards Comp-Att Passing Yards Yards per pass Yards per play 3rd Down EFF Penalties
LOU Lost ATS 34 227.00 18-31 247.00 8 7.29 1-11 7-59
GT Won ATS 38 175.00 19-32 313.00 9.8 6.97 6-13 11-91
Pre game W EXP. Actual Post Game W EXP. Play Fade
LOU 67.689% 62.849% 53.6813% —— ——
GT 32.311% 37.151% 46.3187% —— ——
Team Final Score Act. yds vs act. spread Game should’ve been.. Actual Margin Post game margin Closing Total Closing Spread Post game W/L Projection Margin
MOST 17.00 Worse than predicted Lower Scoring 31 37.50 60.5 32.50 Should have lost by 37.50
KU 48.00 Better than predicted Lower Scoring -31 -37.50 60.5 -32.50 Should have won by 37.50
Team Post game total Actual Points Scored OFF Plays Actual Yds Score should’ve been.. TO Adjusted TO 1st Downs Next Week
MOST 58.54 65 48.00 217 10.52 2 -0.71 10.00 FADE
KU 58.54 65 66.00 521 48.02 1 1.00 27.00 PLAY
Team ATS Rush Att Rushing Yards Comp-Att Passing Yards Yards per pass Yards per play 3rd Down EFF Penalties
MOST Won ATS 27 74.00 14-21 143.00 6.8 4.52 1-9 6-50
KU Lost ATS 38 245.00 22-28 276.00 9.9 7.89 6-11 11-91
Pre game W EXP. Actual Post Game W EXP. Play Fade
MOST 1.654% 2.104% 0.6963% —— MOST
KU 98.346% 97.896% 99.3037% KU ——
Team Final Score Act. yds vs act. spread Game should’ve been.. Actual Margin Post game margin Closing Total Closing Spread Post game W/L Projection Margin
STAN 37.00 Better than predicted Lower Scoring -13 -4.92 54 -2.00 Should have won by 4.92
HAW 24.00 Worse than predicted Lower Scoring 13 4.92 54 2.00 Should have lost by 4.92
Team Post game total Actual Points Scored OFF Plays Actual Yds Score should’ve been.. TO Adjusted TO 1st Downs Next Week
STAN 52.20 61 70.00 406 28.56 0 0.00 24.00 GOOD
HAW 52.20 61 69.00 350 23.64 0 -0.17 20.00 BAD
Team ATS Rush Att Rushing Yards Comp-Att Passing Yards Yards per pass Yards per play 3rd Down EFF Penalties
STAN Won ATS 34 158.00 25-36 248.00 6.9 5.80 6-14 9-81
HAW Lost ATS 16 -5.00 30-53 355.00 6.7 5.07 8-16 11-91
Pre game W EXP. Actual Post Game W EXP. Play Fade
STAN 55.217% 80.302% 62.6396% —— ——
HAW 44.783% 19.698% 37.3604% —— ——
Team Final Score Act. yds vs act. spread Game should’ve been.. Actual Margin Post game margin Closing Total Closing Spread Post game W/L Projection Margin
UTM 7.00 Worse than predicted Higher Scoring 41 51.74 56.5 50.00 Should have lost by 51.74
UGA 48.00 Better than predicted Higher Scoring -41 -51.74 56.5 -50.00 Should have won by 51.74
Team Post game total Actual Points Scored OFF Plays Actual Yds Score should’ve been.. TO Adjusted TO 1st Downs Next Week
UTM 72.28 55 62.00 262 10.27 1 -3.17 15.00 FADE
UGA 72.28 55 69.00 559 62.01 0 0.00 28.00 PLAY
Team ATS Rush Att Rushing Yards Comp-Att Passing Yards Yards per pass Yards per play 3rd Down EFF Penalties
UTM Won ATS 29 134.00 18-33 128.00 3.9 4.23 2-14 10-72
UGA Lost ATS 30 159.00 26-39 400.00 10.3 8.10 5-12 11-91
Pre game W EXP. Actual Post Game W EXP. Play Fade
UTM 0.052% 0.359% 0.0346% —— UTM
UGA 99.948% 99.641% 99.9654% UGA ——
Team Final Score Act. yds vs act. spread Game should’ve been.. Actual Margin Post game margin Closing Total Closing Spread Post game W/L Projection Margin
COLG 0.00 Worse than predicted Higher Scoring 65 65.41 49.5 40.00 Should have lost by 65.41
SYR 65.00 Better than predicted Higher Scoring -65 -65.41 49.5 -40.00 Should have won by 65.41
Team Post game total Actual Points Scored OFF Plays Actual Yds Score should’ve been.. TO Adjusted TO 1st Downs Next Week
COLG 70.21 65 58.00 106 2.40 3 -0.33 7.00 BAD
SYR 70.21 65 89.00 677 67.81 3 3.00 34.00 GOOD
Team ATS Rush Att Rushing Yards Comp-Att Passing Yards Yards per pass Yards per play 3rd Down EFF Penalties
COLG Lost ATS 38 54.00 11-20 52.00 2.6 1.83 3-17 6-40
SYR Won ATS 52 271.00 28-37 406.00 11 7.61 9-16 11-91
Pre game W EXP. Actual Post Game W EXP. Play Fade
COLG 0.436% 0.001% 0.0009% —— ——
SYR 99.564% 99.999% 99.9991% —— ——
Team Final Score Act. yds vs act. spread Game should’ve been.. Actual Margin Post game margin Closing Total Closing Spread Post game W/L Projection Margin
BRY 14.00 Better than predicted Lower Scoring 30 11.25 66 16.50 Should have lost by 11.25
UNLV 44.00 Worse than predicted Lower Scoring -30 -11.25 66 -16.50 Should have won by 11.25
Team Post game total Actual Points Scored OFF Plays Actual Yds Score should’ve been.. TO Adjusted TO 1st Downs Next Week
BRY 57.15 58 71.00 409 22.95 1 -0.38 19.00 PLAY
UNLV 57.15 58 64.00 409 34.20 2 2.00 18.00 FADE
Team ATS Rush Att Rushing Yards Comp-Att Passing Yards Yards per pass Yards per play 3rd Down EFF Penalties
BRY Lost ATS 40 179.00 19-31 230.00 7.4 5.76 4-13 5-44
UNLV Won ATS 40 283.00 15-24 126.00 5.3 6.39 9-15 11-91
Pre game W EXP. Actual Post Game W EXP. Play Fade
BRY 13.963% 2.458% 23.0273% BRY ——
UNLV 86.037% 97.542% 76.9727% —— UNLV
Team Final Score Act. yds vs act. spread Game should’ve been.. Actual Margin Post game margin Closing Total Closing Spread Post game W/L Projection Margin
ECU 3.00 Better than predicted Higher Scoring 27 27.90 53.5 36.00 Should have lost by 27.90
MICH 30.00 Worse than predicted Higher Scoring -27 -27.90 53.5 -36.00 Should have won by 27.90
Team Post game total Actual Points Scored OFF Plays Actual Yds Score should’ve been.. TO Adjusted TO 1st Downs Next Week
ECU 49.86 33 55.00 235 10.98 1 -2.00 12.00 GOOD
MICH 49.86 33 62.00 402 38.88 0 0.00 26.00 BAD
Team ATS Rush Att Rushing Yards Comp-Att Passing Yards Yards per pass Yards per play 3rd Down EFF Penalties
ECU Won ATS 26 103.00 17-29 132.00 4.6 4.27 5-13 10-88
MICH Lost ATS 31 122.00 26-31 280.00 9 6.48 6-10 11-91
Pre game W EXP. Actual Post Game W EXP. Play Fade
ECU 0.912% 3.832% 3.3675% —— ——
MICH 99.088% 96.168% 96.6325% —— ——
Team Final Score Act. yds vs act. spread Game should’ve been.. Actual Margin Post game margin Closing Total Closing Spread Post game W/L Projection Margin
OSU 23.00 Better than predicted Higher Scoring -20 -31.30 59 -30.00 Should have won by 31.30
IU 3.00 Worse than predicted Higher Scoring 20 31.30 59 30.00 Should have lost by 31.30
Team Post game total Actual Points Scored OFF Plays Actual Yds Score should’ve been.. TO Adjusted TO 1st Downs Next Week
OSU 41.79 26 67.00 380 36.54 1 1.00 22.00 PLAY
IU 41.79 26 53.00 153 5.24 0 -2.50 8.00 FADE
Team ATS Rush Att Rushing Yards Comp-Att Passing Yards Yards per pass Yards per play 3rd Down EFF Penalties
OSU Lost ATS 31 143.00 21-36 237.00 6.6 5.67 2-12 5-41
IU Won ATS 33 71.00 9-20 82.00 4.1 2.89 4-15 11-91
Pre game W EXP. Actual Post Game W EXP. Play Fade
OSU 97.542% 90.515% 97.9939% OSU ——
IU 2.458% 9.485% 2.0061% —— IU
Team Final Score Act. yds vs act. spread Game should’ve been.. Actual Margin Post game margin Closing Total Closing Spread Post game W/L Projection Margin
MTSU 7.00 Better than predicted Lower Scoring 49 32.00 52 39.50 Should have lost by 32.00
ALA 56.00 Worse than predicted Lower Scoring -49 -32.00 52 -39.50 Should have won by 32.00
Team Post game total Actual Points Scored OFF Plays Actual Yds Score should’ve been.. TO Adjusted TO 1st Downs Next Week
MTSU 52.29 63 61.00 211 10.14 2 -1.29 13.00 PLAY
ALA 52.29 63 64.00 431 42.14 0 0.00 23.00 FADE
Team ATS Rush Att Rushing Yards Comp-Att Passing Yards Yards per pass Yards per play 3rd Down EFF Penalties
MTSU Lost ATS 26 78.00 24-35 133.00 3.8 3.46 6-16 9-84
ALA Won ATS 40 205.00 17-24 226.00 9.4 6.73 10-13 11-91
Pre game W EXP. Actual Post Game W EXP. Play Fade
MTSU 0.480% 0.066% 1.7936% MTSU ——
ALA 99.520% 99.934% 98.2064% —— ALA
Team Final Score Act. yds vs act. spread Game should’ve been.. Actual Margin Post game margin Closing Total Closing Spread Post game W/L Projection Margin
NEV 14.00 Worse than predicted Higher Scoring 52 48.66 63.5 37.50 Should have lost by 48.66
USC 66.00 Better than predicted Higher Scoring -52 -48.66 63.5 -37.50 Should have won by 48.66
Team Post game total Actual Points Scored OFF Plays Actual Yds Score should’ve been.. TO Adjusted TO 1st Downs Next Week
NEV 81.87 80 72.00 360 16.60 1 -2.13 12.00 BAD
USC 81.87 80 54.00 668 65.26 1 1.00 27.00 GOOD
Team ATS Rush Att Rushing Yards Comp-Att Passing Yards Yards per pass Yards per play 3rd Down EFF Penalties
NEV Lost ATS 38 49.00 22-34 311.00 9.1 5.00 5-19 4-49
USC Won ATS 20 215.00 25-34 453.00 13.3 12.37 2-6 11-91
Pre game W EXP. Actual Post Game W EXP. Play Fade
NEV 0.697% 0.033% 0.0709% —— ——
USC 99.303% 99.967% 99.9291% —— ——
Team Final Score Act. yds vs act. spread Game should’ve been.. Actual Margin Post game margin Closing Total Closing Spread Post game W/L Projection Margin
WVU 15.00 Worse than predicted Higher Scoring 23 23.49 48 21.00 Should have lost by 23.49
PSU 38.00 Better than predicted Higher Scoring -23 -23.49 48 -21.00 Should have won by 23.49
Team Post game total Actual Points Scored OFF Plays Actual Yds Score should’ve been.. TO Adjusted TO 1st Downs Next Week
WVU 57.10 53 67.00 308 16.80 0 -1.75 17.00 BAD
PSU 57.10 53 65.00 478 40.30 0 0.00 27.00 GOOD
Team ATS Rush Att Rushing Yards Comp-Att Passing Yards Yards per pass Yards per play 3rd Down EFF Penalties
WVU Lost ATS 40 146.00 16-27 162.00 6 4.60 4-14 5-55
PSU Won ATS 35 146.00 22-30 332.00 11.1 7.35 3-9 11-91
Pre game W EXP. Actual Post Game W EXP. Play Fade
WVU 8.425% 6.575% 6.1707% —— ——
PSU 91.575% 93.425% 93.8293% —— ——
Team Final Score Act. yds vs act. spread Game should’ve been.. Actual Margin Post game margin Closing Total Closing Spread Post game W/L Projection Margin
BOIS 19.00 Worse than predicted Lower Scoring 37 16.41 59 14.00 Should have lost by 16.41
WASH 56.00 Better than predicted Lower Scoring -37 -16.41 59 -14.00 Should have won by 16.41
Team Post game total Actual Points Scored OFF Plays Actual Yds Score should’ve been.. TO Adjusted TO 1st Downs Next Week
BOIS 68.64 75 75.00 402 26.12 2 0.83 21.00 BAD
WASH 68.64 75 61.00 568 42.53 0 0.00 22.00 GOOD
Team ATS Rush Att Rushing Yards Comp-Att Passing Yards Yards per pass Yards per play 3rd Down EFF Penalties
BOIS Lost ATS 28 138.00 22-47 264.00 5.6 5.36 6-17 3-29
WASH Won ATS 19 78.00 31-42 490.00 11.7 9.31 4-10 11-91
Pre game W EXP. Actual Post Game W EXP. Play Fade
BOIS 17.930% 0.763% 14.0962% —— ——
WASH 82.070% 99.237% 85.9038% —— ——
Team Final Score Act. yds vs act. spread Game should’ve been.. Actual Margin Post game margin Closing Total Closing Spread Post game W/L Projection Margin
RICE 10.00 Better than predicted Higher Scoring 27 31.99 59 35.50 Should have lost by 31.99
TEX 37.00 Worse than predicted Higher Scoring -27 -31.99 59 -35.50 Should have won by 31.99
Team Post game total Actual Points Scored OFF Plays Actual Yds Score should’ve been.. TO Adjusted TO 1st Downs Next Week
RICE 51.58 47 51.00 176 9.79 3 0.04 8.00 GOOD
TEX 51.58 47 75.00 458 41.78 0 0.00 24.00 BAD
Team ATS Rush Att Rushing Yards Comp-Att Passing Yards Yards per pass Yards per play 3rd Down EFF Penalties
RICE Won ATS 25 27.00 14-26 149.00 5.7 3.45 4-13 5-25
TEX Lost ATS 39 158.00 22-36 300.00 8.3 6.11 6-15 11-91
Pre game W EXP. Actual Post Game W EXP. Play Fade
RICE 0.996% 3.832% 1.7958% —— ——
TEX 99.004% 96.168% 98.2042% —— ——
Team Final Score Act. yds vs act. spread Game should’ve been.. Actual Margin Post game margin Closing Total Closing Spread Post game W/L Projection Margin
UVA 13.00 Worse than predicted Lower Scoring 36 37.40 56 27.50 Should have lost by 37.40
TENN 49.00 Better than predicted Lower Scoring -36 -37.40 56 -27.50 Should have won by 37.40
Team Post game total Actual Points Scored OFF Plays Actual Yds Score should’ve been.. TO Adjusted TO 1st Downs Next Week
UVA 54.12 62 64.00 201 8.36 0 -2.29 12.00 BAD
TENN 54.12 62 85.00 499 45.76 1 1.00 29.00 GOOD
Team ATS Rush Att Rushing Yards Comp-Att Passing Yards Yards per pass Yards per play 3rd Down EFF Penalties
UVA Lost ATS 40 95.00 11-24 106.00 4.4 3.14 5-18 2-10
TENN Won ATS 52 287.00 23-33 212.00 6.4 5.87 5-13 11-91
Pre game W EXP. Actual Post Game W EXP. Play Fade
UVA 3.567% 0.912% 0.7095% —— ——
TENN 96.433% 99.088% 99.2905% —— ——
Team Final Score Act. yds vs act. spread Game should’ve been.. Actual Margin Post game margin Closing Total Closing Spread Post game W/L Projection Margin
TNST 3.00 Worse than predicted Higher Scoring 53 55.64 55 48.50 Should have lost by 55.64
ND 56.00 Better than predicted Higher Scoring -53 -55.64 55 -48.50 Should have won by 55.64
Team Post game total Actual Points Scored OFF Plays Actual Yds Score should’ve been.. TO Adjusted TO 1st Downs Next Week
TNST 65.89 59 57.00 158 5.12 2 -2.04 12.00 BAD
ND 65.89 59 63.00 557 60.76 1 1.00 26.00 GOOD
Team ATS Rush Att Rushing Yards Comp-Att Passing Yards Yards per pass Yards per play 3rd Down EFF Penalties
TNST Lost ATS 35 91.00 8-22 67.00 3 2.77 4-14 5-45
ND Won ATS 33 221.00 24-30 336.00 11.2 8.84 9-11 11-91
Pre game W EXP. Actual Post Game W EXP. Play Fade
TNST 0.074% 0.026% 0.0132% —— ——
ND 99.926% 99.974% 99.9868% —— ——
Team Final Score Act. yds vs act. spread Game should’ve been.. Actual Margin Post game margin Closing Total Closing Spread Post game W/L Projection Margin
PRST 7.00 Worse than predicted Lower Scoring 74 70.79 64.5 48.00 Should have lost by 70.79
ORE 81.00 Better than predicted Lower Scoring -74 -70.79 64.5 -48.00 Should have won by 70.79
Team Post game total Actual Points Scored OFF Plays Actual Yds Score should’ve been.. TO Adjusted TO 1st Downs Next Week
PRST 85.52 88 57.00 200 7.36 1 -3.00 9.00 BAD
ORE 85.52 88 72.00 729 78.15 0 0.00 37.00 GOOD
Team ATS Rush Att Rushing Yards Comp-Att Passing Yards Yards per pass Yards per play 3rd Down EFF Penalties
PRST Lost ATS 37 148.00 8-20 52.00 2.6 3.51 4-15 4-50
ORE Won ATS 34 348.00 33-38 381.00 10 10.13 3-7 11-91
Pre game W EXP. Actual Post Game W EXP. Play Fade
PRST 0.082% 0.000% 0.0002% —— ——
ORE 99.918% 100.000% 99.9998% —— ——
Team Final Score Act. yds vs act. spread Game should’ve been.. Actual Margin Post game margin Closing Total Closing Spread Post game W/L Projection Margin
SEMO 0.00 Worse than predicted Higher Scoring 45 44.14 56.5 28.50 Should have lost by 44.14
KSU 45.00 Better than predicted Higher Scoring -45 -44.14 56.5 -28.50 Should have won by 44.14
Team Post game total Actual Points Scored OFF Plays Actual Yds Score should’ve been.. TO Adjusted TO 1st Downs Next Week
SEMO 63.56 45 63.00 227 9.71 0 -2.38 13.00 BAD
KSU 63.56 45 71.00 588 53.85 1 1.00 28.00 GOOD
Team ATS Rush Att Rushing Yards Comp-Att Passing Yards Yards per pass Yards per play 3rd Down EFF Penalties
SEMO Lost ATS 26 6.00 25-37 221.00 6 3.60 4-14 5-65
KSU Won ATS 40 228.00 22-31 360.00 11.6 8.28 4-10 11-91
Pre game W EXP. Actual Post Game W EXP. Play Fade
SEMO 3.082% 0.158% 0.1900% —— ——
KSU 96.918% 99.842% 99.8100% —— ——
Team Final Score Act. yds vs act. spread Game should’ve been.. Actual Margin Post game margin Closing Total Closing Spread Post game W/L Projection Margin
COLO 45.00 Better than predicted Lower Scoring -3 15.09 63 21.00 Should have lost by 15.09
TCU 42.00 Worse than predicted Lower Scoring 3 -15.09 63 -21.00 Should have won by 15.09
Team Post game total Actual Points Scored OFF Plays Actual Yds Score should’ve been.. TO Adjusted TO 1st Downs Next Week
COLO 77.67 87 81.00 565 31.29 1 -0.75 30.00 GOOD
TCU 77.67 87 79.00 541 46.38 2 2.00 27.00 BAD
Team ATS Rush Att Rushing Yards Comp-Att Passing Yards Yards per pass Yards per play 3rd Down EFF Penalties
COLO Won ATS 34 55.00 38-47 510.00 10.9 6.98 9-15 6-35
TCU Lost ATS 37 262.00 24-42 279.00 6.6 6.85 10-17 11-91
Pre game W EXP. Actual Post Game W EXP. Play Fade
COLO 8.425% 57.798% 16.1161% —— ——
TCU 91.575% 42.202% 83.8839% —— ——
Team Final Score Act. yds vs act. spread Game should’ve been.. Actual Margin Post game margin Closing Total Closing Spread Post game W/L Projection Margin
BUFF 17.00 Worse than predicted Higher Scoring 21 34.03 52.5 29.00 Should have lost by 34.03
WIS 38.00 Better than predicted Higher Scoring -21 -34.03 52.5 -29.00 Should have won by 34.03
Team Post game total Actual Points Scored OFF Plays Actual Yds Score should’ve been.. TO Adjusted TO 1st Downs Next Week
BUFF 61.52 55 71.00 316 13.74 0 -2.42 14.00 FADE
WIS 61.52 55 71.00 503 47.78 2 2.00 23.00 PLAY
Team ATS Rush Att Rushing Yards Comp-Att Passing Yards Yards per pass Yards per play 3rd Down EFF Penalties
BUFF Won ATS 30 122.00 26-41 194.00 4.7 4.45 2-15 6-70
WIS Lost ATS 40 314.00 24-31 189.00 6.1 7.08 4-12 11-91
Pre game W EXP. Actual Post Game W EXP. Play Fade
BUFF 2.861% 8.425% 1.2815% —— BUFF
WIS 97.139% 91.575% 98.7185% WIS ——
Team Final Score Act. yds vs act. spread Game should’ve been.. Actual Margin Post game margin Closing Total Closing Spread Post game W/L Projection Margin
ARST 0.00 Worse than predicted Lower Scoring 73 51.41 57.5 36.00 Should have lost by 51.41
OU 73.00 Better than predicted Lower Scoring -73 -51.41 57.5 -36.00 Should have won by 51.41
Team Post game total Actual Points Scored OFF Plays Actual Yds Score should’ve been.. TO Adjusted TO 1st Downs Next Week
ARST 70.39 73 50.00 208 9.49 1 -2.00 10.00 BAD
OU 70.39 73 82.00 642 60.90 0 0.00 36.00 GOOD
Team ATS Rush Att Rushing Yards Comp-Att Passing Yards Yards per pass Yards per play 3rd Down EFF Penalties
ARST Lost ATS 23 48.00 13-27 160.00 5.9 4.16 2-12 14-111
OU Won ATS 49 220.00 30-33 422.00 12.8 7.83 11-14 11-91
Pre game W EXP. Actual Post Game W EXP. Play Fade
ARST 0.912% 0.000% 0.0375% —— ——
OU 99.088% 100.000% 99.9625% —— ——
Team Final Score Act. yds vs act. spread Game should’ve been.. Actual Margin Post game margin Closing Total Closing Spread Post game W/L Projection Margin
UNC 31.00 Better than predicted Higher Scoring -14 -11.29 63.5 -2.50 Should have won by 11.29
SC 17.00 Worse than predicted Higher Scoring 14 11.29 63.5 2.50 Should have lost by 11.29
Team Post game total Actual Points Scored OFF Plays Actual Yds Score should’ve been.. TO Adjusted TO 1st Downs Next Week
UNC 54.46 48 71.00 437 32.88 2 2.00 21.00 GOOD
SC 54.46 48 70.00 351 21.59 0 -0.21 20.00 BAD
Team ATS Rush Att Rushing Yards Comp-Att Passing Yards Yards per pass Yards per play 3rd Down EFF Penalties
UNC Won ATS 39 168.00 24-32 269.00 8.4 6.15 8-13 7-49
SC Lost ATS 31 -2.00 30-39 353.00 9.1 5.01 4-14 11-91
Pre game W EXP. Actual Post Game W EXP. Play Fade
UNC 56.511% 82.070% 77.0384% —— ——
SC 43.489% 17.930% 22.9616% —— ——
Team Final Score Act. yds vs act. spread Game should’ve been.. Actual Margin Post game margin Closing Total Closing Spread Post game W/L Projection Margin
MER 7.00 Worse than predicted Lower Scoring 66 49.41 59.5 35.00 Should have lost by 49.41
MISS 73.00 Better than predicted Lower Scoring -66 -49.41 59.5 -35.00 Should have won by 49.41
Team Post game total Actual Points Scored OFF Plays Actual Yds Score should’ve been.. TO Adjusted TO 1st Downs Next Week
MER 73.69 80 68.00 235 12.14 3 0.08 15.00 BAD
MISS 73.69 80 74.00 667 61.55 1 1.00 32.00 GOOD
Team ATS Rush Att Rushing Yards Comp-Att Passing Yards Yards per pass Yards per play 3rd Down EFF Penalties
MER Lost ATS 37 93.00 17-31 142.00 4.6 3.46 3-14 7-50
MISS Won ATS 33 143.00 29-41 524.00 12.8 9.01 8-11 11-91
Pre game W EXP. Actual Post Game W EXP. Play Fade
MER 1.086% 0.001% 0.0597% —— ——
MISS 98.914% 99.999% 99.9403% —— ——
Team Final Score Act. yds vs act. spread Game should’ve been.. Actual Margin Post game margin Closing Total Closing Spread Post game W/L Projection Margin
UNM 10.00 Better than predicted Lower Scoring 42 30.32 48.5 37.50 Should have lost by 30.32
TA&M 52.00 Worse than predicted Lower Scoring -42 -30.32 48.5 -37.50 Should have won by 30.32
Team Post game total Actual Points Scored OFF Plays Actual Yds Score should’ve been.. TO Adjusted TO 1st Downs Next Week
UNM 50.40 62 60.00 222 10.04 1 -2.13 18.00 PLAY
TA&M 50.40 62 63.00 411 40.36 0 0.00 27.00 FADE
Team ATS Rush Att Rushing Yards Comp-Att Passing Yards Yards per pass Yards per play 3rd Down EFF Penalties
UNM Lost ATS 32 91.00 16-28 131.00 4.7 3.70 3-13 10-114
TA&M Won ATS 29 134.00 24-34 277.00 8.1 6.52 3-7 11-91
Pre game W EXP. Actual Post Game W EXP. Play Fade
UNM 0.697% 0.294% 2.3402% UNM ——
TA&M 99.303% 99.706% 97.6598% —— TA&M
Team Final Score Act. yds vs act. spread Game should’ve been.. Actual Margin Post game margin Closing Total Closing Spread Post game W/L Projection Margin
USA 17.00 Worse than predicted Lower Scoring 20 10.82 51 6.00 Should have lost by 10.82
TULN 37.00 Better than predicted Lower Scoring -20 -10.82 51 -6.00 Should have won by 10.82
Team Post game total Actual Points Scored OFF Plays Actual Yds Score should’ve been.. TO Adjusted TO 1st Downs Next Week
USA 48.92 54 62.00 265 19.05 5 4.50 18.00 BAD
TULN 48.92 54 53.00 436 29.87 3 3.00 16.00 GOOD
Team ATS Rush Att Rushing Yards Comp-Att Passing Yards Yards per pass Yards per play 3rd Down EFF Penalties
USA Lost ATS 32 75.00 23-30 190.00 6.3 4.27 8-13 7-60
TULN Won ATS 38 142.00 14-15 294.00 19.6 8.23 4-8 11-91
Pre game W EXP. Actual Post Game W EXP. Play Fade
USA 34.700% 9.485% 23.9061% —— ——
TULN 65.300% 90.515% 76.0939% —— ——
Team Final Score Act. yds vs act. spread Game should’ve been.. Actual Margin Post game margin Closing Total Closing Spread Post game W/L Projection Margin
USU 14.00 Better than predicted Higher Scoring 10 6.00 43.5 24.00 Should have lost by 6.00
IOWA 24.00 Worse than predicted Higher Scoring -10 -6.00 43.5 -24.00 Should have won by 6.00
Team Post game total Actual Points Scored OFF Plays Actual Yds Score should’ve been.. TO Adjusted TO 1st Downs Next Week
USU 42.94 38 72.00 329 18.47 1 -1.00 19.00 GOOD
IOWA 42.94 38 69.00 284 24.47 0 0.00 17.00 BAD
Team ATS Rush Att Rushing Yards Comp-Att Passing Yards Yards per pass Yards per play 3rd Down EFF Penalties
USU Won ATS 24 116.00 32-48 213.00 4.4 4.57 5-17 10-91
IOWA Lost ATS 36 88.00 18-33 196.00 5.9 4.12 6-17 11-91
Pre game W EXP. Actual Post Game W EXP. Play Fade
USU 5.777% 25.600% 34.6909% —— ——
IOWA 94.223% 74.400% 65.3091% —— ——
Team Final Score Act. yds vs act. spread Game should’ve been.. Actual Margin Post game margin Closing Total Closing Spread Post game W/L Projection Margin
BALL 14.00 Better than predicted Lower Scoring 30 14.56 49 25.00 Should have lost by 14.56
UK 44.00 Worse than predicted Lower Scoring -30 -14.56 49 -25.00 Should have won by 14.56
Team Post game total Actual Points Scored OFF Plays Actual Yds Score should’ve been.. TO Adjusted TO 1st Downs Next Week
BALL 47.10 58 71.00 295 16.27 2 -0.08 18.00 PLAY
UK 47.10 58 51.00 357 30.83 1 1.00 17.00 FADE
Team ATS Rush Att Rushing Yards Comp-Att Passing Yards Yards per pass Yards per play 3rd Down EFF Penalties
BALL Lost ATS 41 72.00 22-30 223.00 7.4 4.15 9-17 4-26
UK Won ATS 20 116.00 18-31 241.00 7.8 7.00 4-9 11-91
Pre game W EXP. Actual Post Game W EXP. Play Fade
BALL 5.057% 2.458% 16.9789% BALL ——
UK 94.943% 97.542% 83.0211% —— UK
Team Final Score Act. yds vs act. spread Game should’ve been.. Actual Margin Post game margin Closing Total Closing Spread Post game W/L Projection Margin
BGSU 24.00 Better than predicted Lower Scoring 10 0.55 48.5 8.50 Should have lost by 0.55
LIB 34.00 Worse than predicted Lower Scoring -10 -0.55 48.5 -8.50 Should have won by 0.55
Team Post game total Actual Points Scored OFF Plays Actual Yds Score should’ve been.. TO Adjusted TO 1st Downs Next Week
BGSU 49.87 58 62.00 328 24.66 5 4.29 19.00 PLAY
LIB 49.87 58 69.00 389 25.21 1 1.00 22.00 FADE
Team ATS Rush Att Rushing Yards Comp-Att Passing Yards Yards per pass Yards per play 3rd Down EFF Penalties
BGSU Lost ATS 31 191.00 11-31 137.00 4.4 5.29 2-12 9-86
LIB Won ATS 49 246.00 11-20 143.00 7.2 5.64 5-12 11-91
Pre game W EXP. Actual Post Game W EXP. Play Fade
BGSU 28.863% 25.600% 48.5700% BGSU ——
LIB 71.137% 74.400% 51.4300% —— LIB
Team Final Score Act. yds vs act. spread Game should’ve been.. Actual Margin Post game margin Closing Total Closing Spread Post game W/L Projection Margin
FRES 39.00 Better than predicted Lower Scoring -4 -8.27 47 4.00 Should have won by 8.27
PUR 35.00 Worse than predicted Lower Scoring 4 8.27 47 -4.00 Should have lost by 8.27
Team Post game total Actual Points Scored OFF Plays Actual Yds Score should’ve been.. TO Adjusted TO 1st Downs Next Week
FRES 58.43 74 82.00 487 33.35 1 0.67 27.00 GOOD
PUR 58.43 74 60.00 363 25.08 0 0.00 19.00 BAD
Team ATS Rush Att Rushing Yards Comp-Att Passing Yards Yards per pass Yards per play 3rd Down EFF Penalties
FRES Won ATS 37 116.00 32-45 371.00 8.2 5.94 11-17 7-66
PUR Lost ATS 30 109.00 17-30 254.00 8.5 6.05 3-12 11-91
Pre game W EXP. Actual Post Game W EXP. Play Fade
FRES 39.655% 60.345% 70.6265% —— ——
PUR 60.345% 39.655% 29.3735% —— ——
Team Final Score Act. yds vs act. spread Game should’ve been.. Actual Margin Post game margin Closing Total Closing Spread Post game W/L Projection Margin
LT 14.00 Worse than predicted Higher Scoring 24 22.15 66 21.00 Should have lost by 22.15
SMU 38.00 Better than predicted Higher Scoring -24 -22.15 66 -21.00 Should have won by 22.15
Team Post game total Actual Points Scored OFF Plays Actual Yds Score should’ve been.. TO Adjusted TO 1st Downs Next Week
LT 53.06 52 57.00 269 15.45 1 -0.75 11.00 BAD
SMU 53.06 52 79.00 457 37.60 0 0.00 24.00 GOOD
Team ATS Rush Att Rushing Yards Comp-Att Passing Yards Yards per pass Yards per play 3rd Down EFF Penalties
LT Lost ATS 24 28.00 21-33 241.00 7.3 4.72 5-14 5-54
SMU Won ATS 41 209.00 23-38 248.00 6.5 5.78 7-19 11-91
Pre game W EXP. Actual Post Game W EXP. Play Fade
LT 8.425% 5.777% 7.3187% —— ——
SMU 91.575% 94.223% 92.6813% —— ——
Team Final Score Act. yds vs act. spread Game should’ve been.. Actual Margin Post game margin Closing Total Closing Spread Post game W/L Projection Margin
NIU 27.00 Better than predicted Lower Scoring -3 2.16 50 8.00 Should have lost by 2.16
BC 24.00 Worse than predicted Lower Scoring 3 -2.16 50 -8.00 Should have won by 2.16
Team Post game total Actual Points Scored OFF Plays Actual Yds Score should’ve been.. TO Adjusted TO 1st Downs Next Week
NIU 45.01 51 78.00 338 21.42 1 0.33 21.00 GOOD
BC 45.01 51 66.00 314 23.59 1 1.00 19.00 BAD
Team ATS Rush Att Rushing Yards Comp-Att Passing Yards Yards per pass Yards per play 3rd Down EFF Penalties
NIU Won ATS 48 166.00 14-30 172.00 5.7 4.33 10-18 4-35
BC Lost ATS 28 146.00 17-38 168.00 4.4 4.76 6-17 11-91
Pre game W EXP. Actual Post Game W EXP. Play Fade
NIU 29.993% 57.798% 44.3643% —— ——
BC 70.007% 42.202% 55.6357% —— ——
Team Final Score Act. yds vs act. spread Game should’ve been.. Actual Margin Post game margin Closing Total Closing Spread Post game W/L Projection Margin
LIU 10.00 Better than predicted Higher Scoring 17 21.69 58 34.50 Should have lost by 21.69
OHIO 27.00 Worse than predicted Higher Scoring -17 -21.69 58 -34.50 Should have won by 21.69
Team Post game total Actual Points Scored OFF Plays Actual Yds Score should’ve been.. TO Adjusted TO 1st Downs Next Week
LIU 38.90 37 55.00 206 8.60 2 -0.88 13.00 GOOD
OHIO 38.90 37 60.00 303 30.30 2 2.00 18.00 BAD
Team ATS Rush Att Rushing Yards Comp-Att Passing Yards Yards per pass Yards per play 3rd Down EFF Penalties
LIU Won ATS 22 34.00 21-33 172.00 5.2 3.75 3-13 5-40
OHIO Lost ATS 45 199.00 12-15 104.00 6.9 5.05 6-12 11-91
Pre game W EXP. Actual Post Game W EXP. Play Fade
LIU 1.184% 13.248% 7.7428% —— ——
OHIO 98.816% 86.752% 92.2572% —— ——
Team Final Score Act. yds vs act. spread Game should’ve been.. Actual Margin Post game margin Closing Total Closing Spread Post game W/L Projection Margin
WCU 13.00 Better than predicted Lower Scoring 43 15.85 61 38.00 Should have lost by 15.85
ARK 56.00 Worse than predicted Lower Scoring -43 -15.85 61 -38.00 Should have won by 15.85
Team Post game total Actual Points Scored OFF Plays Actual Yds Score should’ve been.. TO Adjusted TO 1st Downs Next Week
WCU 51.32 69 70.00 291 17.73 5 1.83 18.00 PLAY
ARK 51.32 69 61.00 379 33.59 0 0.00 21.00 FADE
Team ATS Rush Att Rushing Yards Comp-Att Passing Yards Yards per pass Yards per play 3rd Down EFF Penalties
WCU Lost ATS 30 64.00 25-40 227.00 5.7 4.16 4-15 3-30
ARK Won ATS 36 105.00 20-25 274.00 11 6.21 6-13 11-91
Pre game W EXP. Actual Post Game W EXP. Play Fade
WCU 0.635% 0.240% 14.9288% WCU ——
ARK 99.365% 99.760% 85.0712% —— ARK
Team Final Score Act. yds vs act. spread Game should’ve been.. Actual Margin Post game margin Closing Total Closing Spread Post game W/L Projection Margin
RMU 7.00 Worse than predicted Higher Scoring 35 47.71 51 47.00 Should have lost by 47.71
AFA 42.00 Better than predicted Higher Scoring -35 -47.71 51 -47.00 Should have won by 47.71
Team Post game total Actual Points Scored OFF Plays Actual Yds Score should’ve been.. TO Adjusted TO 1st Downs Next Week
RMU 57.06 49 49.00 165 4.68 1 -2.92 9.00 FADE
AFA 57.06 49 56.00 475 52.39 1 1.00 24.00 PLAY
Team ATS Rush Att Rushing Yards Comp-Att Passing Yards Yards per pass Yards per play 3rd Down EFF Penalties
RMU Won ATS 25 52.00 18-24 113.00 4.7 3.37 3-11 9-61
AFA Lost ATS 53 380.00 2-3 95.00 31.7 8.48 6-10 11-91
Pre game W EXP. Actual Post Game W EXP. Play Fade
RMU 0.103% 1.086% 0.0879% —— RMU
AFA 99.897% 98.914% 99.9121% AFA ——
Team Final Score Act. yds vs act. spread Game should’ve been.. Actual Margin Post game margin Closing Total Closing Spread Post game W/L Projection Margin
ETSU 3.00 Better than predicted Lower Scoring 46 12.33 55 20.50 Should have lost by 12.33
JVST 49.00 Worse than predicted Lower Scoring -46 -12.33 55 -20.50 Should have won by 12.33
Team Post game total Actual Points Scored OFF Plays Actual Yds Score should’ve been.. TO Adjusted TO 1st Downs Next Week
ETSU 41.56 52 56.00 204 14.62 4 2.29 12.00 PLAY
JVST 41.56 52 75.00 364 26.95 0 0.00 25.00 FADE
Team ATS Rush Att Rushing Yards Comp-Att Passing Yards Yards per pass Yards per play 3rd Down EFF Penalties
ETSU Lost ATS 38 87.00 10-18 117.00 6.5 3.64 1-11 9-88
JVST Won ATS 56 237.00 13-19 127.00 6.7 4.85 7-13 11-91
Pre game W EXP. Actual Post Game W EXP. Play Fade
ETSU 8.943% 0.128% 20.9445% ETSU ——
JVST 91.057% 99.872% 79.0555% —— JVST
Team Final Score Act. yds vs act. spread Game should’ve been.. Actual Margin Post game margin Closing Total Closing Spread Post game W/L Projection Margin
UNI 9.00 Better than predicted Lower Scoring 21 -3.07 40.5 7.00 Should have won by 3.07
ISU 30.00 Worse than predicted Lower Scoring -21 3.07 40.5 -7.00 Should have lost by 3.07
Team Post game total Actual Points Scored OFF Plays Actual Yds Score should’ve been.. TO Adjusted TO 1st Downs Next Week
UNI 36.47 39 72.00 279 19.77 2 1.42 19.00 PLAY
ISU 36.47 39 45.00 250 16.70 0 0.00 11.00 FADE
Team ATS Rush Att Rushing Yards Comp-Att Passing Yards Yards per pass Yards per play 3rd Down EFF Penalties
UNI Lost ATS 37 106.00 17-35 173.00 4.9 3.88 3-15 6-52
ISU Won ATS 27 134.00 14-18 116.00 6.4 5.56 2-11 11-91
Pre game W EXP. Actual Post Game W EXP. Play Fade
UNI 32.311% 8.425% 57.9841% UNI ——
ISU 67.689% 91.575% 42.0159% —— ISU
Team Final Score Act. yds vs act. spread Game should’ve been.. Actual Margin Post game margin Closing Total Closing Spread Post game W/L Projection Margin
AKR 21.00 Better than predicted Lower Scoring 3 7.58 55 9.50 Should have lost by 7.58
TEM 24.00 Worse than predicted Lower Scoring -3 -7.58 55 -9.50 Should have won by 7.58
Team Post game total Actual Points Scored OFF Plays Actual Yds Score should’ve been.. TO Adjusted TO 1st Downs Next Week
AKR 44.11 45 57.00 279 18.27 1 0.21 13.00 GOOD
TEM 44.11 45 77.00 353 25.84 0 0.00 20.00 BAD
Team ATS Rush Att Rushing Yards Comp-Att Passing Yards Yards per pass Yards per play 3rd Down EFF Penalties
AKR Won ATS 28 74.00 17-29 205.00 7.1 4.89 3-12 10-82
TEM Lost ATS 28 61.00 28-49 292.00 6 4.58 8-17 11-91
Pre game W EXP. Actual Post Game W EXP. Play Fade
AKR 26.666% 42.202% 30.9653% —— ——
TEM 73.334% 57.798% 69.0347% —— ——
Team Final Score Act. yds vs act. spread Game should’ve been.. Actual Margin Post game margin Closing Total Closing Spread Post game W/L Projection Margin
MASS 14.00 Better than predicted Lower Scoring 45 29.84 52 35.00 Should have lost by 29.84
AUB 59.00 Worse than predicted Lower Scoring -45 -29.84 52 -35.00 Should have won by 29.84
Team Post game total Actual Points Scored OFF Plays Actual Yds Score should’ve been.. TO Adjusted TO 1st Downs Next Week
MASS 61.45 73 51.00 301 15.81 2 -0.92 11.00 PLAY
AUB 61.45 73 69.00 492 45.64 0 0.00 27.00 FADE
Team ATS Rush Att Rushing Yards Comp-Att Passing Yards Yards per pass Yards per play 3rd Down EFF Penalties
MASS Lost ATS 27 140.00 14-24 161.00 6.7 5.90 1-9 9-73
AUB Won ATS 44 289.00 14-25 203.00 8.1 7.13 6-10 11-91
Pre game W EXP. Actual Post Game W EXP. Play Fade
MASS 1.086% 0.158% 2.5196% MASS ——
AUB 98.914% 99.842% 97.4804% —— AUB
Team Final Score Act. yds vs act. spread Game should’ve been.. Actual Margin Post game margin Closing Total Closing Spread Post game W/L Projection Margin
TOW 6.00 Better than predicted Higher Scoring 32 33.54 55.5 38.50 Should have lost by 33.54
MD 38.00 Worse than predicted Higher Scoring -32 -33.54 55.5 -38.50 Should have won by 33.54
Team Post game total Actual Points Scored OFF Plays Actual Yds Score should’ve been.. TO Adjusted TO 1st Downs Next Week
TOW 57.20 44 65.00 276 11.83 0 -3.21 16.00 GOOD
MD 57.20 44 79.00 449 45.37 0 0.00 30.00 BAD
Team ATS Rush Att Rushing Yards Comp-Att Passing Yards Yards per pass Yards per play 3rd Down EFF Penalties
TOW Won ATS 34 148.00 16-31 128.00 4.1 4.25 5-15 10-90
MD Lost ATS 36 166.00 26-43 283.00 6.6 5.68 7-14 11-91
Pre game W EXP. Actual Post Game W EXP. Play Fade
TOW 0.579% 1.794% 1.3937% —— ——
MD 99.421% 98.206% 98.6063% —— ——
Team Final Score Act. yds vs act. spread Game should’ve been.. Actual Margin Post game margin Closing Total Closing Spread Post game W/L Projection Margin
USF 24.00 Better than predicted Higher Scoring 17 -2.46 71.5 13.50 Should have won by 2.46
WKU 41.00 Worse than predicted Higher Scoring -17 2.46 71.5 -13.50 Should have lost by 2.46
Team Post game total Actual Points Scored OFF Plays Actual Yds Score should’ve been.. TO Adjusted TO 1st Downs Next Week
USF 69.43 65 95.00 540 35.94 3 1.88 26.00 PLAY
WKU 69.43 65 73.00 465 33.49 0 0.00 22.00 FADE
Team ATS Rush Att Rushing Yards Comp-Att Passing Yards Yards per pass Yards per play 3rd Down EFF Penalties
USF Lost ATS 61 374.00 15-34 166.00 4.9 5.68 8-21 11-100
WKU Won ATS 23 129.00 29-50 336.00 6.7 6.37 6-16 11-91
Pre game W EXP. Actual Post Game W EXP. Play Fade
USF 18.801% 13.248% 56.4029% USF ——
WKU 81.199% 86.752% 43.5971% —— WKU
Team Final Score Act. yds vs act. spread Game should’ve been.. Actual Margin Post game margin Closing Total Closing Spread Post game W/L Projection Margin
WOF 7.00 Worse than predicted Higher Scoring 38 43.02 49.5 37.50 Should have lost by 43.02
PITT 45.00 Better than predicted Higher Scoring -38 -43.02 49.5 -37.50 Should have won by 43.02
Team Post game total Actual Points Scored OFF Plays Actual Yds Score should’ve been.. TO Adjusted TO 1st Downs Next Week
WOF 52.58 52 36.00 126 4.78 1 -2.13 7.00 BAD
PITT 52.58 52 77.00 491 47.80 0 0.00 30.00 GOOD
Team ATS Rush Att Rushing Yards Comp-Att Passing Yards Yards per pass Yards per play 3rd Down EFF Penalties
WOF Lost ATS 19 -1.00 12-17 127.00 7.5 3.50 1-9 2-20
PITT Won ATS 45 217.00 22-32 274.00 8.6 6.38 8-14 11-91
Pre game W EXP. Actual Post Game W EXP. Play Fade
WOF 0.697% 0.635% 0.2394% —— ——
PITT 99.303% 99.365% 99.7606% —— ——
Team Final Score Act. yds vs act. spread Game should’ve been.. Actual Margin Post game margin Closing Total Closing Spread Post game W/L Projection Margin
EKU 13.00 Worse than predicted Lower Scoring 53 35.45 57.5 21.50 Should have lost by 35.45
CIN 66.00 Better than predicted Lower Scoring -53 -35.45 57.5 -21.50 Should have won by 35.45
Team Post game total Actual Points Scored OFF Plays Actual Yds Score should’ve been.. TO Adjusted TO 1st Downs Next Week
EKU 72.15 79 57.00 302 18.35 3 1.21 15.00 BAD
CIN 72.15 79 71.00 667 53.80 1 1.00 30.00 GOOD
Team ATS Rush Att Rushing Yards Comp-Att Passing Yards Yards per pass Yards per play 3rd Down EFF Penalties
EKU Lost ATS 32 125.00 13-25 177.00 7.1 5.30 3-11 7-42
CIN Won ATS 44 229.00 23-27 438.00 16.2 9.39 10-14 11-91
Pre game W EXP. Actual Post Game W EXP. Play Fade
EKU 7.929% 0.026% 1.0041% —— ——
CIN 92.071% 99.974% 98.9959% —— ——
Team Final Score Act. yds vs act. spread Game should’ve been.. Actual Margin Post game margin Closing Total Closing Spread Post game W/L Projection Margin
GWEB 24.00 Better than predicted Lower Scoring 21 8.12 51 22.50 Should have lost by 8.12
APP 45.00 Worse than predicted Lower Scoring -21 -8.12 51 -22.50 Should have won by 8.12
Team Post game total Actual Points Scored OFF Plays Actual Yds Score should’ve been.. TO Adjusted TO 1st Downs Next Week
GWEB 53.95 69 73.00 365 22.92 3 1.13 19.00 GOOD
APP 53.95 69 67.00 394 31.04 0 0.00 23.00 BAD
Team ATS Rush Att Rushing Yards Comp-Att Passing Yards Yards per pass Yards per play 3rd Down EFF Penalties
GWEB Won ATS 27 134.00 30-46 231.00 5 5.00 7-17 5-50
APP Lost ATS 43 150.00 18-24 244.00 10.2 5.88 4-13 11-91
Pre game W EXP. Actual Post Game W EXP. Play Fade
GWEB 7.005% 8.425% 29.7154% —— ——
APP 92.995% 91.575% 70.2846% —— ——
Team Final Score Act. yds vs act. spread Game should’ve been.. Actual Margin Post game margin Closing Total Closing Spread Post game W/L Projection Margin
SELA 7.00 Worse than predicted Higher Scoring 41 37.72 59.5 31.50 Should have lost by 37.72
MSST 48.00 Better than predicted Higher Scoring -41 -37.72 59.5 -31.50 Should have won by 37.72
Team Post game total Actual Points Scored OFF Plays Actual Yds Score should’ve been.. TO Adjusted TO 1st Downs Next Week
SELA 58.04 55 54.00 208 10.16 1 -1.63 10.00 BAD
MSST 58.04 55 68.00 525 47.88 0 0.00 23.00 GOOD
Team ATS Rush Att Rushing Yards Comp-Att Passing Yards Yards per pass Yards per play 3rd Down EFF Penalties
SELA Lost ATS 26 83.00 16-28 125.00 4.5 3.85 5-15 5-25
MSST Won ATS 39 298.00 20-29 227.00 7.8 7.72 5-11 11-91
Pre game W EXP. Actual Post Game W EXP. Play Fade
SELA 1.943% 0.359% 0.6690% —— ——
MSST 98.057% 99.641% 99.3310% —— ——
Team Final Score Act. yds vs act. spread Game should’ve been.. Actual Margin Post game margin Closing Total Closing Spread Post game W/L Projection Margin
CAL 58.00 Better than predicted Lower Scoring -37 -31.62 53.5 -5.00 Should have won by 31.62
UNT 21.00 Worse than predicted Lower Scoring 37 31.62 53.5 5.00 Should have lost by 31.62
Team Post game total Actual Points Scored OFF Plays Actual Yds Score should’ve been.. TO Adjusted TO 1st Downs Next Week
CAL 62.79 79 95.00 669 47.20 2 2.00 30.00 GOOD
UNT 62.79 79 53.00 225 15.58 3 2.58 10.00 BAD
Team ATS Rush Att Rushing Yards Comp-Att Passing Yards Yards per pass Yards per play 3rd Down EFF Penalties
CAL Won ATS 56 357.00 27-39 312.00 8 7.04 9-18 8-60
UNT Lost ATS 27 41.00 15-26 184.00 7.1 4.25 2-11 11-91
Pre game W EXP. Actual Post Game W EXP. Play Fade
CAL 62.849% 99.237% 98.0932% —— ——
UNT 37.151% 0.763% 1.9068% —— ——
Team Final Score Act. yds vs act. spread Game should’ve been.. Actual Margin Post game margin Closing Total Closing Spread Post game W/L Projection Margin
SCST 3.00 Worse than predicted Higher Scoring 21 24.57 44.5 24.00 Should have lost by 24.57
CLT 24.00 Better than predicted Higher Scoring -21 -24.57 44.5 -24.00 Should have won by 24.57
Team Post game total Actual Points Scored OFF Plays Actual Yds Score should’ve been.. TO Adjusted TO 1st Downs Next Week
SCST 38.45 27 55.00 168 6.94 1 -1.00 8.00 FADE
CLT 38.45 27 66.00 345 31.51 2 2.00 18.00 PLAY
Team ATS Rush Att Rushing Yards Comp-Att Passing Yards Yards per pass Yards per play 3rd Down EFF Penalties
SCST Won ATS 38 109.00 6-17 59.00 3.5 3.05 3-14 6-51
CLT Lost ATS 47 220.00 13-19 125.00 6.6 5.23 4-13 11-91
Pre game W EXP. Actual Post Game W EXP. Play Fade
SCST 5.777% 8.425% 5.3563% —— SCST
CLT 94.223% 91.575% 94.6437% CLT ——
Team Final Score Act. yds vs act. spread Game should’ve been.. Actual Margin Post game margin Closing Total Closing Spread Post game W/L Projection Margin
MONM 20.00 Worse than predicted Higher Scoring 22 26.97 56 26.50 Should have lost by 26.97
FAU 42.00 Better than predicted Higher Scoring -22 -26.97 56 -26.50 Should have won by 26.97
Team Post game total Actual Points Scored OFF Plays Actual Yds Score should’ve been.. TO Adjusted TO 1st Downs Next Week
MONM 62.65 62 83.00 361 17.84 1 -1.21 19.00 FADE
FAU 62.65 62 59.00 493 44.81 2 2.00 22.00 PLAY
Team ATS Rush Att Rushing Yards Comp-Att Passing Yards Yards per pass Yards per play 3rd Down EFF Penalties
MONM Won ATS 36 112.00 26-47 249.00 5.3 4.35 7-20 8-62
FAU Lost ATS 32 213.00 22-27 280.00 10.4 8.36 3-9 11-91
Pre game W EXP. Actual Post Game W EXP. Play Fade
MONM 4.113% 7.456% 3.8484% —— MONM
FAU 95.887% 92.544% 96.1516% FAU ——
Team Final Score Act. yds vs act. spread Game should’ve been.. Actual Margin Post game margin Closing Total Closing Spread Post game W/L Projection Margin
CIT 0.00 Worse than predicted Higher Scoring 34 38.74 53.5 34.50 Should have lost by 38.74
GASO 34.00 Better than predicted Higher Scoring -34 -38.74 53.5 -34.50 Should have won by 38.74
Team Post game total Actual Points Scored OFF Plays Actual Yds Score should’ve been.. TO Adjusted TO 1st Downs Next Week
CIT 54.62 34 51.00 212 7.94 1 -1.88 12.00 FADE
GASO 54.62 34 74.00 473 46.68 2 2.00 29.00 PLAY
Team ATS Rush Att Rushing Yards Comp-Att Passing Yards Yards per pass Yards per play 3rd Down EFF Penalties
CIT Won ATS 43 198.00 2-8 14.00 1.8 4.16 2-12 4-28
GASO Lost ATS 34 200.00 31-40 273.00 6.8 6.39 2-7 11-91
Pre game W EXP. Actual Post Game W EXP. Play Fade
CIT 1.184% 1.289% 0.5532% —— CIT
GASO 98.816% 98.711% 99.4468% GASO ——
Team Final Score Act. yds vs act. spread Game should’ve been.. Actual Margin Post game margin Closing Total Closing Spread Post game W/L Projection Margin
BUCK 3.00 Better than predicted Higher Scoring 35 41.49 53.5 47.00 Should have lost by 41.49
JMU 38.00 Worse than predicted Higher Scoring -35 -41.49 53.5 -47.00 Should have won by 41.49
Team Post game total Actual Points Scored OFF Plays Actual Yds Score should’ve been.. TO Adjusted TO 1st Downs Next Week
BUCK 55.32 41 57.00 208 6.92 1 -2.92 9.00 GOOD
JMU 55.32 41 65.00 436 48.41 1 1.00 22.00 BAD
Team ATS Rush Att Rushing Yards Comp-Att Passing Yards Yards per pass Yards per play 3rd Down EFF Penalties
BUCK Won ATS 34 62.00 15-23 146.00 6.3 3.65 3-15 7-70
JMU Lost ATS 41 261.00 12-24 175.00 7.3 6.71 5-12 11-91
Pre game W EXP. Actual Post Game W EXP. Play Fade
BUCK 0.103% 1.086% 0.3258% —— ——
JMU 99.897% 98.914% 99.6742% —— ——
Team Final Score Act. yds vs act. spread Game should’ve been.. Actual Margin Post game margin Closing Total Closing Spread Post game W/L Projection Margin
ALB 17.00 Better than predicted Higher Scoring 4 21.28 47.5 22.00 Should have lost by 21.28
MRSH 21.00 Worse than predicted Higher Scoring -4 -21.28 47.5 -22.00 Should have won by 21.28
Team Post game total Actual Points Scored OFF Plays Actual Yds Score should’ve been.. TO Adjusted TO 1st Downs Next Week
ALB 51.54 38 74.00 300 15.13 0 -1.83 19.00 GOOD
MRSH 51.54 38 61.00 413 36.41 1 1.00 21.00 BAD
Team ATS Rush Att Rushing Yards Comp-Att Passing Yards Yards per pass Yards per play 3rd Down EFF Penalties
ALB Won ATS 36 106.00 22-38 194.00 5.1 4.05 4-16 5-47
MRSH Lost ATS 26 145.00 28-35 268.00 7.7 6.77 1-10 11-91
Pre game W EXP. Actual Post Game W EXP. Play Fade
ALB 7.456% 39.655% 8.1448% —— ——
MRSH 92.544% 60.345% 91.8552% —— ——
Team Final Score Act. yds vs act. spread Game should’ve been.. Actual Margin Post game margin Closing Total Closing Spread Post game W/L Projection Margin
ME 12.00 Better than predicted Higher Scoring 2 6.34 46 15.00 Should have lost by 6.34
FIU 14.00 Worse than predicted Higher Scoring -2 -6.34 46 -15.00 Should have won by 6.34
Team Post game total Actual Points Scored OFF Plays Actual Yds Score should’ve been.. TO Adjusted TO 1st Downs Next Week
ME 47.09 26 85.00 378 20.38 1 -0.25 27.00 GOOD
FIU 47.09 26 54.00 305 26.71 3 3.00 13.00 BAD
Team ATS Rush Att Rushing Yards Comp-Att Passing Yards Yards per pass Yards per play 3rd Down EFF Penalties
ME Won ATS 41 165.00 21-44 213.00 4.8 4.45 5-15 5-50
FIU Lost ATS 24 13.00 15-30 292.00 9.7 5.65 3-12 11-91
Pre game W EXP. Actual Post Game W EXP. Play Fade
ME 16.265% 44.783% 33.8884% —— ——
FIU 83.735% 55.217% 66.1116% —— ——
Team Final Score Act. yds vs act. spread Game should’ve been.. Actual Margin Post game margin Closing Total Closing Spread Post game W/L Projection Margin
ARMY 13.00 Better than predicted Higher Scoring 4 -8.67 47 -8.50 Should have won by 8.67
ULM 17.00 Worse than predicted Higher Scoring -4 8.67 47 8.50 Should have lost by 8.67
Team Post game total Actual Points Scored OFF Plays Actual Yds Score should’ve been.. TO Adjusted TO 1st Downs Next Week
ARMY 40.21 30 62.00 283 24.44 5 5.00 14.00 PLAY
ULM 40.21 30 62.00 299 15.77 2 1.29 15.00 FADE
Team ATS Rush Att Rushing Yards Comp-Att Passing Yards Yards per pass Yards per play 3rd Down EFF Penalties
ARMY Lost ATS 50 176.00 6-12 107.00 8.9 4.56 6-15 3-35
ULM Won ATS 32 207.00 14-30 92.00 3.1 4.82 4-15 11-91
Pre game W EXP. Actual Post Game W EXP. Play Fade
ARMY 71.137% 39.655% 71.5170% ARMY ——
ULM 28.863% 60.345% 28.4830% —— ULM
Team Final Score Act. yds vs act. spread Game should’ve been.. Actual Margin Post game margin Closing Total Closing Spread Post game W/L Projection Margin
AAMU 13.00 Better than predicted Lower Scoring 34 32.30 53.5 35.00 Should have lost by 32.30
VAN 47.00 Worse than predicted Lower Scoring -34 -32.30 53.5 -35.00 Should have won by 32.30
Team Post game total Actual Points Scored OFF Plays Actual Yds Score should’ve been.. TO Adjusted TO 1st Downs Next Week
AAMU 57.35 60 67.00 278 12.53 1 -1.92 14.00 GOOD
VAN 57.35 60 65.00 461 44.83 1 1.00 24.00 BAD
Team ATS Rush Att Rushing Yards Comp-Att Passing Yards Yards per pass Yards per play 3rd Down EFF Penalties
AAMU Won ATS 33 135.00 18-34 143.00 4.2 4.15 6-18 9-50
VAN Lost ATS 34 215.00 17-31 246.00 7.9 7.09 9-14 11-91
Pre game W EXP. Actual Post Game W EXP. Play Fade
AAMU 1.086% 1.289% 1.7092% —— ——
VAN 98.914% 98.711% 98.2908% —— ——
Team Final Score Act. yds vs act. spread Game should’ve been.. Actual Margin Post game margin Closing Total Closing Spread Post game W/L Projection Margin
WSU 50.00 Better than predicted Lower Scoring -26 -19.51 54 -9.50 Should have won by 19.51
CSU 24.00 Worse than predicted Lower Scoring 26 19.51 54 9.50 Should have lost by 19.51
Team Post game total Actual Points Scored OFF Plays Actual Yds Score should’ve been.. TO Adjusted TO 1st Downs Next Week
WSU 64.14 74 87.00 556 41.82 2 2.00 30.00 GOOD
CSU 64.14 74 64.00 357 22.32 2 1.21 18.00 BAD
Team ATS Rush Att Rushing Yards Comp-Att Passing Yards Yards per pass Yards per play 3rd Down EFF Penalties
WSU Won ATS 37 90.00 38-50 466.00 9.3 6.39 11-17 3-20
CSU Lost ATS 20 37.00 28-44 320.00 7.3 5.58 5-14 11-91
Pre game W EXP. Actual Post Game W EXP. Play Fade
WSU 73.334% 95.590% 89.9609% —— ——
CSU 26.666% 4.410% 10.0391% —— ——
Team Final Score Act. yds vs act. spread Game should’ve been.. Actual Margin Post game margin Closing Total Closing Spread Post game W/L Projection Margin
TXST 42.00 Better than predicted Lower Scoring -11 22.92 58.5 26.50 Should have lost by 22.92
BAY 31.00 Worse than predicted Lower Scoring 11 -22.92 58.5 -26.50 Should have won by 22.92
Team Post game total Actual Points Scored OFF Plays Actual Yds Score should’ve been.. TO Adjusted TO 1st Downs Next Week
TXST 69.93 73 69.00 441 23.51 2 -0.21 20.00 GOOD
BAY 69.93 73 76.00 524 46.43 2 2.00 22.00 BAD
Team ATS Rush Att Rushing Yards Comp-Att Passing Yards Yards per pass Yards per play 3rd Down EFF Penalties
TXST Won ATS 39 143.00 22-30 298.00 9.9 6.39 5-13 4-31
BAY Lost ATS 32 108.00 27-44 416.00 9.5 6.89 8-18 11-91
Pre game W EXP. Actual Post Game W EXP. Play Fade
TXST 4.113% 76.464% 6.6411% —— ——
BAY 95.887% 23.536% 93.3589% —— ——
Team Final Score Act. yds vs act. spread Game should’ve been.. Actual Margin Post game margin Closing Total Closing Spread Post game W/L Projection Margin
UTSA 14.00 Better than predicted Higher Scoring 3 -13.04 59.5 -2.50 Should have won by 13.04
HOU 17.00 Worse than predicted Higher Scoring -3 13.04 59.5 2.50 Should have lost by 13.04
Team Post game total Actual Points Scored OFF Plays Actual Yds Score should’ve been.. TO Adjusted TO 1st Downs Next Week
UTSA 51.91 31 71.00 417 32.47 3 3.00 22.00 PLAY
HOU 51.91 31 72.00 334 19.44 0 -0.21 19.00 FADE
Team ATS Rush Att Rushing Yards Comp-Att Passing Yards Yards per pass Yards per play 3rd Down EFF Penalties
UTSA Lost ATS 35 208.00 18-36 209.00 5.8 5.87 4-13 8-64
HOU Won ATS 38 101.00 22-34 233.00 6.9 4.64 5-15 11-91
Pre game W EXP. Actual Post Game W EXP. Play Fade
UTSA 56.511% 42.202% 80.3670% UTSA ——
HOU 43.489% 57.798% 19.6330% —— HOU
Team Final Score Act. yds vs act. spread Game should’ve been.. Actual Margin Post game margin Closing Total Closing Spread Post game W/L Projection Margin
CARK 13.00 Better than predicted Higher Scoring 14 19.23 59.5 25.50 Should have lost by 19.23
OKST 27.00 Worse than predicted Higher Scoring -14 -19.23 59.5 -25.50 Should have won by 19.23
Team Post game total Actual Points Scored OFF Plays Actual Yds Score should’ve been.. TO Adjusted TO 1st Downs Next Week
CARK 60.84 40 65.00 391 20.81 1 -1.13 19.00 GOOD
OKST 60.84 40 79.00 453 40.03 1 1.00 24.00 BAD
Team ATS Rush Att Rushing Yards Comp-Att Passing Yards Yards per pass Yards per play 3rd Down EFF Penalties
CARK Won ATS 28 123.00 24-37 268.00 7.2 6.02 5-13 9-63
OKST Lost ATS 31 149.00 30-48 304.00 6.3 5.73 6-15 11-91
Pre game W EXP. Actual Post Game W EXP. Play Fade
CARK 4.725% 17.930% 10.3712% —— ——
OKST 95.275% 82.070% 89.6288% —— ——
Team Final Score Act. yds vs act. spread Game should’ve been.. Actual Margin Post game margin Closing Total Closing Spread Post game W/L Projection Margin
BCU 14.00 Worse than predicted Lower Scoring 42 64.87 59.5 49.00 Should have lost by 64.87
MEM 56.00 Better than predicted Lower Scoring -42 -64.87 59.5 -49.00 Should have won by 64.87
Team Post game total Actual Points Scored OFF Plays Actual Yds Score should’ve been.. TO Adjusted TO 1st Downs Next Week
BCU 62.09 70 48.00 91 -1.39 1 -3.08 4.00 FADE
MEM 62.09 70 81.00 551 63.48 3 3.00 27.00 PLAY
Team ATS Rush Att Rushing Yards Comp-Att Passing Yards Yards per pass Yards per play 3rd Down EFF Penalties
BCU Won ATS 24 52.00 13-24 39.00 1.6 1.90 1-15 7-50
MEM Lost ATS 43 208.00 28-38 343.00 9 6.80 4-12 11-91
Pre game W EXP. Actual Post Game W EXP. Play Fade
BCU 0.066% 0.294% 0.0011% —— BCU
MEM 99.934% 99.706% 99.9989% MEM ——
Team Final Score Act. yds vs act. spread Game should’ve been.. Actual Margin Post game margin Closing Total Closing Spread Post game W/L Projection Margin
ALCN 14.00 Worse than predicted Lower Scoring 26 25.07 47.5 24.00 Should have lost by 25.07
USM 40.00 Better than predicted Lower Scoring -26 -25.07 47.5 -24.00 Should have won by 25.07
Team Post game total Actual Points Scored OFF Plays Actual Yds Score should’ve been.. TO Adjusted TO 1st Downs Next Week
ALCN 49.82 54 43.00 226 12.37 2 0.00 8.00 BAD
USM 49.82 54 69.00 441 37.45 1 1.00 25.00 GOOD
Team ATS Rush Att Rushing Yards Comp-Att Passing Yards Yards per pass Yards per play 3rd Down EFF Penalties
ALCN Lost ATS 29 182.00 5-14 44.00 3.1 5.26 3-11 7-77
USM Won ATS 38 145.00 24-31 296.00 9.5 6.39 5-14 11-91
Pre game W EXP. Actual Post Game W EXP. Play Fade
ALCN 5.777% 4.410% 5.0071% —— ——
USM 94.223% 95.590% 94.9929% —— ——
Team Final Score Act. yds vs act. spread Game should’ve been.. Actual Margin Post game margin Closing Total Closing Spread Post game W/L Projection Margin
SFA 30.00 Worse than predicted Lower Scoring 18 41.68 48 26.00 Should have lost by 41.68
TROY 48.00 Better than predicted Lower Scoring -18 -41.68 48 -26.00 Should have won by 41.68
Team Post game total Actual Points Scored OFF Plays Actual Yds Score should’ve been.. TO Adjusted TO 1st Downs Next Week
SFA 59.41 78 59.00 240 8.87 1 -1.17 17.00 FADE
TROY 59.41 78 64.00 540 50.54 4 4.00 24.00 PLAY
Team ATS Rush Att Rushing Yards Comp-Att Passing Yards Yards per pass Yards per play 3rd Down EFF Penalties
SFA Won ATS 28 104.00 18-31 136.00 4.4 4.07 4-13 3-35
TROY Lost ATS 42 342.00 14-22 198.00 9 8.44 7-12 11-91
Pre game W EXP. Actual Post Game W EXP. Play Fade
SFA 4.410% 11.893% 0.3139% —— SFA
TROY 95.590% 88.107% 99.6861% TROY ——
Team Final Score Act. yds vs act. spread Game should’ve been.. Actual Margin Post game margin Closing Total Closing Spread Post game W/L Projection Margin
TOL 28.00 Better than predicted Lower Scoring 2 0.90 45.5 7.00 Should have lost by 0.90
ILL 30.00 Worse than predicted Lower Scoring -2 -0.90 45.5 -7.00 Should have won by 0.90
Team Post game total Actual Points Scored OFF Plays Actual Yds Score should’ve been.. TO Adjusted TO 1st Downs Next Week
TOL 54.47 58 79.00 416 26.79 1 0.42 27.00 GOOD
ILL 54.47 58 61.00 374 27.68 1 1.00 20.00 BAD
Team ATS Rush Att Rushing Yards Comp-Att Passing Yards Yards per pass Yards per play 3rd Down EFF Penalties
TOL Won ATS 42 186.00 20-37 230.00 6.2 5.27 7-15 7-40
ILL Lost ATS 35 163.00 18-26 211.00 8.1 6.13 3-9 11-91
Pre game W EXP. Actual Post Game W EXP. Play Fade
TOL 32.311% 44.783% 47.6477% —— ——
ILL 67.689% 55.217% 52.3523% —— ——
Team Final Score Act. yds vs act. spread Game should’ve been.. Actual Margin Post game margin Closing Total Closing Spread Post game W/L Projection Margin
ODU 17.00 Better than predicted Lower Scoring 19 6.87 48 16.00 Should have lost by 6.87
VT 36.00 Worse than predicted Lower Scoring -19 -6.87 48 -16.00 Should have won by 6.87
Team Post game total Actual Points Scored OFF Plays Actual Yds Score should’ve been.. TO Adjusted TO 1st Downs Next Week
ODU 46.85 53 68.00 295 19.99 3 1.67 19.00 PLAY
VT 46.85 53 73.00 368 26.86 0 0.00 18.00 FADE
Team ATS Rush Att Rushing Yards Comp-Att Passing Yards Yards per pass Yards per play 3rd Down EFF Penalties
ODU Lost ATS 43 201.00 13-25 94.00 3.8 4.34 8-15 4-36
VT Won ATS 43 109.00 18-30 259.00 8.6 5.04 8-16 11-91
Pre game W EXP. Actual Post Game W EXP. Play Fade
ODU 14.705% 10.640% 32.6159% ODU ——
VT 85.295% 89.360% 67.3841% —— VT
Team Final Score Act. yds vs act. spread Game should’ve been.. Actual Margin Post game margin Closing Total Closing Spread Post game W/L Projection Margin
NWST 13.00 Worse than predicted Lower Scoring 25 38.44 54.5 35.00 Should have lost by 38.44
UL 38.00 Better than predicted Lower Scoring -25 -38.44 54.5 -35.00 Should have won by 38.44
Team Post game total Actual Points Scored OFF Plays Actual Yds Score should’ve been.. TO Adjusted TO 1st Downs Next Week
NWST 49.39 51 68.00 187 5.47 1 -1.92 8.00 FADE
UL 49.39 51 66.00 429 43.92 3 3.00 20.00 PLAY
Team ATS Rush Att Rushing Yards Comp-Att Passing Yards Yards per pass Yards per play 3rd Down EFF Penalties
NWST Won ATS 40 77.00 12-28 110.00 3.9 2.75 2-19 7-70
UL Lost ATS 34 206.00 14-32 223.00 7 6.50 4-14 11-91
Pre game W EXP. Actual Post Game W EXP. Play Fade
NWST 1.086% 5.057% 0.5852% —— NWST
UL 98.914% 94.943% 99.4148% UL ——
Team Final Score Act. yds vs act. spread Game should’ve been.. Actual Margin Post game margin Closing Total Closing Spread Post game W/L Projection Margin
TTU 33.00 Worse than predicted Lower Scoring 2 -12.57 50.5 -13.00 Should have won by 12.57
WYO 35.00 Better than predicted Lower Scoring -2 12.57 50.5 13.00 Should have lost by 12.57
Team Post game total Actual Points Scored OFF Plays Actual Yds Score should’ve been.. TO Adjusted TO 1st Downs Next Week
TTU 52.90 68 80.00 431 32.73 1 1.00 26.00 BAD
WYO 52.90 68 78.00 320 20.17 2 0.92 24.00 GOOD
Team ATS Rush Att Rushing Yards Comp-Att Passing Yards Yards per pass Yards per play 3rd Down EFF Penalties
TTU Lost ATS 33 93.00 31-47 338.00 7.2 5.39 7-17 7-69
WYO Won ATS 44 171.00 18-34 149.00 4.4 4.10 6-15 11-91
Pre game W EXP. Actual Post Game W EXP. Play Fade
TTU 80.302% 44.783% 79.5012% —— ——
WYO 19.698% 55.217% 20.4988% —— ——
Team Final Score Act. yds vs act. spread Game should’ve been.. Actual Margin Post game margin Closing Total Closing Spread Post game W/L Projection Margin
WIU 21.00 Worse than predicted Lower Scoring 37 39.17 55 21.00 Should have lost by 39.17
NMSU 58.00 Better than predicted Lower Scoring -37 -39.17 55 -21.00 Should have won by 39.17
Team Post game total Actual Points Scored OFF Plays Actual Yds Score should’ve been.. TO Adjusted TO 1st Downs Next Week
WIU 69.17 79 60.00 278 15.00 0 -1.75 17.00 BAD
NMSU 69.17 79 64.00 650 54.17 0 0.00 26.00 GOOD
Team ATS Rush Att Rushing Yards Comp-Att Passing Yards Yards per pass Yards per play 3rd Down EFF Penalties
WIU Lost ATS 29 36.00 17-31 242.00 7.8 4.63 8-16 8-70
NMSU Won ATS 42 270.00 17-22 380.00 17.3 10.16 7-10 11-91
Pre game W EXP. Actual Post Game W EXP. Play Fade
WIU 8.425% 0.763% 0.5104% —— ——
NMSU 91.575% 99.237% 99.4896% —— ——
Team Final Score Act. yds vs act. spread Game should’ve been.. Actual Margin Post game margin Closing Total Closing Spread Post game W/L Projection Margin
UIW 14.00 Worse than predicted Higher Scoring 14 9.82 57.5 7.50 Should have lost by 9.82
UTEP 28.00 Better than predicted Higher Scoring -14 -9.82 57.5 -7.50 Should have won by 9.82
Team Post game total Actual Points Scored OFF Plays Actual Yds Score should’ve been.. TO Adjusted TO 1st Downs Next Week
UIW 50.96 42 58.00 308 20.57 1 0.38 19.00 BAD
UTEP 50.96 42 63.00 423 30.39 0 0.00 25.00 GOOD
Team ATS Rush Att Rushing Yards Comp-Att Passing Yards Yards per pass Yards per play 3rd Down EFF Penalties
UIW Lost ATS 27 63.00 18-31 245.00 7.9 5.31 5-14 10-93
UTEP Won ATS 50 329.00 10-13 94.00 7.2 6.71 6-9 11-91
Pre game W EXP. Actual Post Game W EXP. Play Fade
UIW 31.143% 17.930% 25.9875% —— ——
UTEP 68.857% 82.070% 74.0125% —— ——
Team Final Score Act. yds vs act. spread Game should’ve been.. Actual Margin Post game margin Closing Total Closing Spread Post game W/L Projection Margin
NAU 3.00 Worse than predicted Higher Scoring 35 32.56 61 28.50 Should have lost by 32.56
ARIZ 38.00 Better than predicted Higher Scoring -35 -32.56 61 -28.50 Should have won by 32.56
Team Post game total Actual Points Scored OFF Plays Actual Yds Score should’ve been.. TO Adjusted TO 1st Downs Next Week
NAU 56.25 41 70.00 264 11.84 1 -1.38 18.00 BAD
ARIZ 56.25 41 53.00 478 44.41 2 2.00 22.00 GOOD
Team ATS Rush Att Rushing Yards Comp-Att Passing Yards Yards per pass Yards per play 3rd Down EFF Penalties
NAU Lost ATS 41 78.00 18-29 186.00 6.4 3.77 6-18 11-84
ARIZ Won ATS 27 186.00 20-26 292.00 11.2 9.02 1-5 11-91
Pre game W EXP. Actual Post Game W EXP. Play Fade
NAU 3.082% 1.086% 1.6367% —— ——
ARIZ 96.918% 98.914% 98.3633% —— ——
Team Final Score Act. yds vs act. spread Game should’ve been.. Actual Margin Post game margin Closing Total Closing Spread Post game W/L Projection Margin
SHSU 0.00 Better than predicted Higher Scoring 14 6.28 46.5 19.00 Should have lost by 6.28
BYU 14.00 Worse than predicted Higher Scoring -14 -6.28 46.5 -19.00 Should have won by 6.28
Team Post game total Actual Points Scored OFF Plays Actual Yds Score should’ve been.. TO Adjusted TO 1st Downs Next Week
SHSU 31.68 14 57.00 185 12.70 3 1.42 11.00 GOOD
BYU 31.68 14 67.00 257 18.98 0 0.00 12.00 BAD
Team ATS Rush Att Rushing Yards Comp-Att Passing Yards Yards per pass Yards per play 3rd Down EFF Penalties
SHSU Won ATS 24 38.00 18-33 147.00 4.5 3.25 2-14 7-47
BYU Lost ATS 34 112.00 20-33 145.00 4.4 3.84 5-16 11-91
Pre game W EXP. Actual Post Game W EXP. Play Fade
SHSU 10.640% 17.930% 34.0170% —— ——
BYU 89.360% 82.070% 65.9830% —— ——
Team Final Score Act. yds vs act. spread Game should’ve been.. Actual Margin Post game margin Closing Total Closing Spread Post game W/L Projection Margin
CCU 13.00 Better than predicted Higher Scoring 14 13.29 66.5 15.50 Should have lost by 13.29
UCLA 27.00 Worse than predicted Higher Scoring -14 -13.29 66.5 -15.50 Should have won by 13.29
Team Post game total Actual Points Scored OFF Plays Actual Yds Score should’ve been.. TO Adjusted TO 1st Downs Next Week
CCU 53.70 40 77.00 345 20.20 3 1.71 21.00 GOOD
UCLA 53.70 40 60.00 417 33.49 3 3.00 19.00 BAD
Team ATS Rush Att Rushing Yards Comp-Att Passing Yards Yards per pass Yards per play 3rd Down EFF Penalties
CCU Won ATS 34 56.00 28-43 289.00 6.7 4.48 8-16 3-45
UCLA Lost ATS 31 153.00 17-29 264.00 9.1 6.95 7-12 11-91
Pre game W EXP. Actual Post Game W EXP. Play Fade
CCU 15.472% 17.930% 19.1769% —— ——
UCLA 84.528% 82.070% 80.8231% —— ——
Team Final Score Act. yds vs act. spread Game should’ve been.. Actual Margin Post game margin Closing Total Closing Spread Post game W/L Projection Margin
IDST 28.00 Better than predicted Lower Scoring 8 21.84 51 34.50 Should have lost by 21.84
SDSU 36.00 Worse than predicted Lower Scoring -8 -21.84 51 -34.50 Should have won by 21.84
Team Post game total Actual Points Scored OFF Plays Actual Yds Score should’ve been.. TO Adjusted TO 1st Downs Next Week
IDST 54.31 64 78.00 343 16.23 3 0.13 23.00 GOOD
SDSU 54.31 64 67.00 389 38.08 3 3.00 18.00 BAD
Team ATS Rush Att Rushing Yards Comp-Att Passing Yards Yards per pass Yards per play 3rd Down EFF Penalties
IDST Won ATS 15 34.00 30-63 309.00 4.9 4.40 6-15 6-50
SDSU Lost ATS 47 302.00 13-20 87.00 4.4 5.81 5-12 11-91
Pre game W EXP. Actual Post Game W EXP. Play Fade
IDST 1.184% 29.993% 7.6006% —— ——
SDSU 98.816% 70.007% 92.3994% —— ——
Team Final Score Act. yds vs act. spread Game should’ve been.. Actual Margin Post game margin Closing Total Closing Spread Post game W/L Projection Margin
LSU 24.00 Worse than predicted Lower Scoring 21 -0.90 56.5 -2.00 Should have won by 0.90
FSU 45.00 Better than predicted Lower Scoring -21 0.90 56.5 2.00 Should have lost by 0.90
Team Post game total Actual Points Scored OFF Plays Actual Yds Score should’ve been.. TO Adjusted TO 1st Downs Next Week
LSU 65.77 69 64.00 460 33.33 2 2.00 23.00 BAD
FSU 65.77 69 66.00 494 32.44 1 0.83 22.00 GOOD
Team ATS Rush Att Rushing Yards Comp-Att Passing Yards Yards per pass Yards per play 3rd Down EFF Penalties
LSU Lost ATS 27 113.00 22-37 347.00 9.4 7.19 3-10 2-30
FSU Won ATS 34 135.00 24-32 359.00 11.2 7.48 9-14 11-91
Pre game W EXP. Actual Post Game W EXP. Play Fade
LSU 55.217% 8.425% 52.3419% —— ——
FSU 44.783% 91.575% 47.6581% —— ——
Team Final Score Act. yds vs act. spread Game should’ve been.. Actual Margin Post game margin Closing Total Closing Spread Post game W/L Projection Margin
ORST 42.00 Better than predicted Lower Scoring -25 -18.89 56.5 -14.00 Should have won by 18.89
SJSU 17.00 Worse than predicted Lower Scoring 25 18.89 56.5 14.00 Should have lost by 18.89
Team Post game total Actual Points Scored OFF Plays Actual Yds Score should’ve been.. TO Adjusted TO 1st Downs Next Week
ORST 53.65 59 63.00 473 36.27 0 0.00 27.00 GOOD
SJSU 53.65 59 64.00 279 17.38 1 -0.17 20.00 BAD
Team ATS Rush Att Rushing Yards Comp-Att Passing Yards Yards per pass Yards per play 3rd Down EFF Penalties
ORST Won ATS 35 197.00 22-28 276.00 9.9 7.51 5-8 9-85
SJSU Lost ATS 22 56.00 25-42 223.00 5.3 4.36 4-13 11-91
Pre game W EXP. Actual Post Game W EXP. Play Fade
ORST 82.070% 94.943% 89.2306% —— ——
SJSU 17.930% 5.057% 10.7694% —— ——
Team Final Score Act. yds vs act. spread Game should’ve been.. Actual Margin Post game margin Closing Total Closing Spread Post game W/L Projection Margin
NU 7.00 Worse than predicted Higher Scoring 17 5.79 39 5.00 Should have lost by 5.79
RUTG 24.00 Better than predicted Higher Scoring -17 -5.79 39 -5.00 Should have won by 5.79
Team Post game total Actual Points Scored OFF Plays Actual Yds Score should’ve been.. TO Adjusted TO 1st Downs Next Week
NU 33.76 31 62.00 201 13.98 2 1.58 13.00 BAD
RUTG 33.76 31 73.00 285 19.77 1 1.00 20.00 GOOD
Team ATS Rush Att Rushing Yards Comp-Att Passing Yards Yards per pass Yards per play 3rd Down EFF Penalties
NU Lost ATS 22 12.00 24-40 189.00 4.7 3.24 4-14 3-30
RUTG Won ATS 44 122.00 17-29 163.00 5.6 3.90 8-18 11-91
Pre game W EXP. Actual Post Game W EXP. Play Fade
NU 37.151% 13.248% 35.2083% —— ——
RUTG 62.849% 86.752% 64.7917% —— ——
Team Final Score Act. yds vs act. spread Game should’ve been.. Actual Margin Post game margin Closing Total Closing Spread Post game W/L Projection Margin
CLEM 7.00 Better than predicted Higher Scoring 21 -11.63 54 -11.50 Should have won by 11.63
DUKE 28.00 Worse than predicted Higher Scoring -21 11.63 54 11.50 Should have lost by 11.63
Team Post game total Actual Points Scored OFF Plays Actual Yds Score should’ve been.. TO Adjusted TO 1st Downs Next Week
CLEM 55.51 35 83.00 422 33.57 3 3.00 29.00 PLAY
DUKE 55.51 35 64.00 374 21.94 2 1.04 17.00 FADE
Team ATS Rush Att Rushing Yards Comp-Att Passing Yards Yards per pass Yards per play 3rd Down EFF Penalties
CLEM Lost ATS 40 213.00 27-43 209.00 4.9 5.08 7-15 1-5
DUKE Won ATS 30 199.00 17-34 175.00 5.1 5.84 5-15 11-91
Pre game W EXP. Actual Post Game W EXP. Play Fade
CLEM 77.460% 8.425% 77.7144% CLEM ——
DUKE 22.540% 91.575% 22.2856% —— DUKE

FCS vs FCS

Team Final Score Act. yds vs act. spread Game should’ve been.. Actual Margin Post game margin Closing Total Closing Spread Post game W/L Projection Margin
EIU 27.00 Better than predicted Higher Scoring -27 7.37 47 13.00 Should have lost by 7.37
INST 0.00 Worse than predicted Higher Scoring 27 -7.37 47 -13.00 Should have won by 7.37
Team Post game total Actual Points Scored OFF Plays Actual Yds Score should’ve been.. TO Adjusted TO 1st Downs Next Week
EIU 37.98 27 59.00 338 15.31 1 -0.08 17.00 GOOD
INST 37.98 27 61.00 219 22.67 6 6.00 16.00 BAD
Team ATS Rush Att Rushing Yards Comp-Att Passing Yards Yards per pass Yards per play 3rd Down EFF Penalties
EIU Won ATS 28 94.00 19-31 244.00 7.9 5.73 5-12 4-55
INST Lost ATS 35 103.00 13-26 116.00 4.5 3.59 4-14 11-91
Pre game W EXP. Actual Post Game W EXP. Play Fade
EIU 19.698% 96.168% 31.4561% —— ——
INST 80.302% 3.832% 68.5439% —— ——
Team Final Score Act. yds vs act. spread Game should’ve been.. Actual Margin Post game margin Closing Total Closing Spread Post game W/L Projection Margin
SAC 38.00 Worse than predicted Lower Scoring -14 -22.82 54.5 -23.50 Should have won by 22.82
NICH 24.00 Better than predicted Lower Scoring 14 22.82 54.5 23.50 Should have lost by 22.82
Team Post game total Actual Points Scored OFF Plays Actual Yds Score should’ve been.. TO Adjusted TO 1st Downs Next Week
SAC 53.69 62 76.00 441 38.25 1 1.00 22.00 BAD
NICH 53.69 62 65.00 293 15.43 1 -0.96 18.00 GOOD
Team ATS Rush Att Rushing Yards Comp-Att Passing Yards Yards per pass Yards per play 3rd Down EFF Penalties
SAC Lost ATS 49 185.00 16-27 256.00 9.5 5.80 7-15 8-80
NICH Won ATS 36 97.00 15-29 196.00 6.8 4.51 4-14 11-91
Pre game W EXP. Actual Post Game W EXP. Play Fade
SAC 93.834% 82.070% 93.2761% —— ——
NICH 6.166% 17.930% 6.7239% —— ——
Team Final Score Act. yds vs act. spread Game should’ve been.. Actual Margin Post game margin Closing Total Closing Spread Post game W/L Projection Margin
W&M 34.00 Worse than predicted Lower Scoring -10 -15.29 54.5 -17.50 Should have won by 15.29
CAM 24.00 Better than predicted Lower Scoring 10 15.29 54.5 17.50 Should have lost by 15.29
Team Post game total Actual Points Scored OFF Plays Actual Yds Score should’ve been.. TO Adjusted TO 1st Downs Next Week
W&M 54.53 58 73.00 452 34.91 0 0.00 27.00 BAD
CAM 54.53 58 55.00 310 19.62 2 0.54 21.00 GOOD
Team ATS Rush Att Rushing Yards Comp-Att Passing Yards Yards per pass Yards per play 3rd Down EFF Penalties
W&M Lost ATS 46 270.00 17-27 182.00 6.7 6.19 8-15 4-30
CAM Won ATS 29 84.00 22-26 226.00 8.7 5.64 2-8 11-91
Pre game W EXP. Actual Post Game W EXP. Play Fade
W&M 87.442% 74.400% 84.1990% —— ——
CAM 12.558% 25.600% 15.8010% —— ——
Team Final Score Act. yds vs act. spread Game should’ve been.. Actual Margin Post game margin Closing Total Closing Spread Post game W/L Projection Margin
DEL 37.00 Better than predicted Higher Scoring -24 -27.06 45.5 -15.00 Should have won by 27.06
STBK 13.00 Worse than predicted Higher Scoring 24 27.06 45.5 15.00 Should have lost by 27.06
Team Post game total Actual Points Scored OFF Plays Actual Yds Score should’ve been.. TO Adjusted TO 1st Downs Next Week
DEL 63.44 50 79.00 559 45.25 4 4.00 28.00 GOOD
STBK 63.44 50 71.00 327 18.19 3 1.75 20.00 BAD
Team ATS Rush Att Rushing Yards Comp-Att Passing Yards Yards per pass Yards per play 3rd Down EFF Penalties
DEL Won ATS 34 145.00 28-45 414.00 9.2 7.08 3-12 2-30
STBK Lost ATS 30 164.00 14-41 163.00 4 4.61 4-13 11-91
Pre game W EXP. Actual Post Game W EXP. Play Fade
DEL 83.735% 94.223% 96.2017% —— ——
STBK 16.265% 5.777% 3.7983% —— ——
Team Final Score Act. yds vs act. spread Game should’ve been.. Actual Margin Post game margin Closing Total Closing Spread Post game W/L Projection Margin
TNTC 10.00 Better than predicted Lower Scoring 35 11.89 49.5 27.00 Should have lost by 11.89
FUR 45.00 Worse than predicted Lower Scoring -35 -11.89 49.5 -27.00 Should have won by 11.89
Team Post game total Actual Points Scored OFF Plays Actual Yds Score should’ve been.. TO Adjusted TO 1st Downs Next Week
TNTC 50.04 55 73.00 298 19.08 6 3.75 18.00 PLAY
FUR 50.04 55 68.00 386 30.96 2 2.00 18.00 FADE
Team ATS Rush Att Rushing Yards Comp-Att Passing Yards Yards per pass Yards per play 3rd Down EFF Penalties
TNTC Lost ATS 31 86.00 26-42 212.00 5 4.08 7-17 6-35
FUR Won ATS 39 196.00 16-29 190.00 6.6 5.68 9-16 11-91
Pre game W EXP. Actual Post Game W EXP. Play Fade
TNTC 3.832% 1.086% 21.7864% TNTC ——
FUR 96.168% 98.914% 78.2136% —— FUR
Team Final Score Act. yds vs act. spread Game should’ve been.. Actual Margin Post game margin Closing Total Closing Spread Post game W/L Projection Margin
VAL 10.00 Better than predicted Lower Scoring 42 32.53 51.5 36.00 Should have lost by 32.53
YSU 52.00 Worse than predicted Lower Scoring -42 -32.53 51.5 -36.00 Should have won by 32.53
Team Post game total Actual Points Scored OFF Plays Actual Yds Score should’ve been.. TO Adjusted TO 1st Downs Next Week
VAL 54.08 62 56.00 195 10.77 3 0.00 14.00 PLAY
YSU 54.08 62 67.00 472 43.30 0 0.00 21.00 FADE
Team ATS Rush Att Rushing Yards Comp-Att Passing Yards Yards per pass Yards per play 3rd Down EFF Penalties
VAL Lost ATS 26 40.00 17-30 155.00 5.2 3.48 4-13 2-10
YSU Won ATS 41 303.00 16-26 169.00 6.5 7.04 6-11 11-91
Pre game W EXP. Actual Post Game W EXP. Play Fade
VAL 0.912% 0.294% 1.6460% VAL ——
YSU 99.088% 99.706% 98.3540% —— YSU
Team Final Score Act. yds vs act. spread Game should’ve been.. Actual Margin Post game margin Closing Total Closing Spread Post game W/L Projection Margin
IDHO 42.00 Better than predicted Lower Scoring -25 -36.70 55.5 -25.50 Should have won by 36.70
LAM 17.00 Worse than predicted Lower Scoring 25 36.70 55.5 25.50 Should have lost by 36.70
Team Post game total Actual Points Scored OFF Plays Actual Yds Score should’ve been.. TO Adjusted TO 1st Downs Next Week
IDHO 52.73 59 57.00 497 44.71 2 2.00 20.00 PLAY
LAM 52.73 59 55.00 190 8.02 1 -1.13 16.00 FADE
Team ATS Rush Att Rushing Yards Comp-Att Passing Yards Yards per pass Yards per play 3rd Down EFF Penalties
IDHO Lost ATS 36 273.00 16-21 224.00 10.7 8.72 6-9 8-101
LAM Won ATS 31 71.00 15-24 119.00 5 3.45 6-13 11-91
Pre game W EXP. Actual Post Game W EXP. Play Fade
IDHO 95.275% 94.943% 99.1943% IDHO ——
LAM 4.725% 5.057% 0.8057% —— LAM
Team Final Score Act. yds vs act. spread Game should’ve been.. Actual Margin Post game margin Closing Total Closing Spread Post game W/L Projection Margin
UNCO 11.00 Worse than predicted Higher Scoring 20 27.75 51.5 13.50 Should have lost by 27.75
ACU 31.00 Better than predicted Higher Scoring -20 -27.75 51.5 -13.50 Should have won by 27.75
Team Post game total Actual Points Scored OFF Plays Actual Yds Score should’ve been.. TO Adjusted TO 1st Downs Next Week
UNCO 49.48 42 58.00 190 10.86 0 -1.13 13.00 BAD
ACU 49.48 42 70.00 493 38.62 0 0.00 28.00 GOOD
Team ATS Rush Att Rushing Yards Comp-Att Passing Yards Yards per pass Yards per play 3rd Down EFF Penalties
UNCO Lost ATS 26 84.00 18-32 106.00 3.3 3.28 5-15 2-30
ACU Won ATS 41 268.00 18-29 225.00 7.8 7.04 6-11 11-91
Pre game W EXP. Actual Post Game W EXP. Play Fade
UNCO 18.801% 9.485% 3.4389% —— ——
ACU 81.199% 90.515% 96.5611% —— ——
Team Final Score Act. yds vs act. spread Game should’ve been.. Actual Margin Post game margin Closing Total Closing Spread Post game W/L Projection Margin
UCD 48.00 Better than predicted Higher Scoring -38 -32.86 48.5 -24.00 Should have won by 32.86
TAMC 10.00 Worse than predicted Higher Scoring 38 32.86 48.5 24.00 Should have lost by 32.86
Team Post game total Actual Points Scored OFF Plays Actual Yds Score should’ve been.. TO Adjusted TO 1st Downs Next Week
UCD 60.58 58 78.00 529 46.72 4 4.00 31.00 GOOD
TAMC 60.58 58 56.00 285 13.86 3 1.00 11.00 BAD
Team ATS Rush Att Rushing Yards Comp-Att Passing Yards Yards per pass Yards per play 3rd Down EFF Penalties
UCD Won ATS 45 279.00 23-33 250.00 7.6 6.78 6-11 0-0
TAMC Lost ATS 37 142.00 11-19 143.00 7.5 5.09 4-13 11-91
Pre game W EXP. Actual Post Game W EXP. Play Fade
UCD 94.223% 99.365% 98.4397% —— ——
TAMC 5.777% 0.635% 1.5603% —— ——
Team Final Score Act. yds vs act. spread Game should’ve been.. Actual Margin Post game margin Closing Total Closing Spread Post game W/L Projection Margin
VILL 38.00 Worse than predicted Higher Scoring -28 -14.55 50.5 -19.00 Should have won by 14.55
LEH 10.00 Better than predicted Higher Scoring 28 14.55 50.5 19.00 Should have lost by 14.55
Team Post game total Actual Points Scored OFF Plays Actual Yds Score should’ve been.. TO Adjusted TO 1st Downs Next Week
VILL 50.02 48 57.00 412 32.28 1 1.00 18.00 FADE
LEH 50.02 48 62.00 284 17.73 3 1.42 13.00 PLAY
Team ATS Rush Att Rushing Yards Comp-Att Passing Yards Yards per pass Yards per play 3rd Down EFF Penalties
VILL Won ATS 31 284.00 15-26 128.00 4.9 7.23 1-10 5-45
LEH Lost ATS 23 78.00 23-39 206.00 5.3 4.58 2-14 11-91
Pre game W EXP. Actual Post Game W EXP. Play Fade
VILL 89.360% 96.683% 82.9950% —— VILL
LEH 10.640% 3.317% 17.0050% LEH ——
Team Final Score Act. yds vs act. spread Game should’ve been.. Actual Margin Post game margin Closing Total Closing Spread Post game W/L Projection Margin
MRST 7.00 Worse than predicted Lower Scoring 42 14.70 47 6.50 Should have lost by 14.70
GTWN 49.00 Better than predicted Lower Scoring -42 -14.70 47 -6.50 Should have won by 14.70
Team Post game total Actual Points Scored OFF Plays Actual Yds Score should’ve been.. TO Adjusted TO 1st Downs Next Week
MRST 42.29 56 53.00 202 13.79 2 1.46 12.00 BAD
GTWN 42.29 56 64.00 401 28.49 1 1.00 25.00 GOOD
Team ATS Rush Att Rushing Yards Comp-Att Passing Yards Yards per pass Yards per play 3rd Down EFF Penalties
MRST Lost ATS 28 113.00 11-25 89.00 3.6 3.81 5-13 7-57
GTWN Won ATS 48 294.00 12-16 107.00 6.7 6.27 7-11 11-91
Pre game W EXP. Actual Post Game W EXP. Play Fade
MRST 33.497% 0.294% 16.7489% —— ——
GTWN 66.503% 99.706% 83.2511% —— ——
Team Final Score Act. yds vs act. spread Game should’ve been.. Actual Margin Post game margin Closing Total Closing Spread Post game W/L Projection Margin
DAY 0.00 Worse than predicted Higher Scoring 41 28.33 46 19.00 Should have lost by 28.33
ILST 41.00 Better than predicted Higher Scoring -41 -28.33 46 -19.00 Should have won by 28.33
Team Post game total Actual Points Scored OFF Plays Actual Yds Score should’ve been.. TO Adjusted TO 1st Downs Next Week
DAY 49.92 41 77.00 203 10.79 1 -0.58 16.00 BAD
ILST 49.92 41 61.00 473 39.12 1 1.00 23.00 GOOD
Team ATS Rush Att Rushing Yards Comp-Att Passing Yards Yards per pass Yards per play 3rd Down EFF Penalties
DAY Lost ATS 46 97.00 17-31 106.00 3.4 2.64 5-19 5-35
ILST Won ATS 24 193.00 29-37 280.00 7.6 7.75 6-12 11-91
Pre game W EXP. Actual Post Game W EXP. Play Fade
DAY 10.640% 0.359% 3.1613% —— ——
ILST 89.360% 99.641% 96.8387% —— ——
Team Final Score Act. yds vs act. spread Game should’ve been.. Actual Margin Post game margin Closing Total Closing Spread Post game W/L Projection Margin
UNH 51.00 Worse than predicted Lower Scoring -34 -16.49 53 -21.00 Should have won by 16.49
STO 17.00 Better than predicted Lower Scoring 34 16.49 53 21.00 Should have lost by 16.49
Team Post game total Actual Points Scored OFF Plays Actual Yds Score should’ve been.. TO Adjusted TO 1st Downs Next Week
UNH 53.49 68 63.00 437 34.99 0 0.00 21.00 FADE
STO 53.49 68 65.00 303 18.50 2 0.25 17.00 PLAY
Team ATS Rush Att Rushing Yards Comp-Att Passing Yards Yards per pass Yards per play 3rd Down EFF Penalties
UNH Won ATS 35 153.00 19-28 284.00 10.1 6.94 6-13 15-121
STO Lost ATS 36 125.00 15-29 178.00 6.1 4.66 3-14 11-91
Pre game W EXP. Actual Post Game W EXP. Play Fade
UNH 91.575% 98.711% 86.0205% —— UNH
STO 8.425% 1.289% 13.9795% STO ——
Team Final Score Act. yds vs act. spread Game should’ve been.. Actual Margin Post game margin Closing Total Closing Spread Post game W/L Projection Margin
DAV 7.00 Worse than predicted Higher Scoring 5 20.69 52.5 6.50 Should have lost by 20.69
VMI 12.00 Better than predicted Higher Scoring -5 -20.69 52.5 -6.50 Should have won by 20.69
Team Post game total Actual Points Scored OFF Plays Actual Yds Score should’ve been.. TO Adjusted TO 1st Downs Next Week
DAV 41.89 19 51.00 184 10.60 1 0.46 8.00 FADE
VMI 41.89 19 73.00 412 31.29 2 2.00 22.00 PLAY
Team ATS Rush Att Rushing Yards Comp-Att Passing Yards Yards per pass Yards per play 3rd Down EFF Penalties
DAV Won ATS 39 101.00 6-12 83.00 6.9 3.61 2-13 1-5
VMI Lost ATS 46 173.00 17-27 239.00 8.9 5.64 6-14 11-91
Pre game W EXP. Actual Post Game W EXP. Play Fade
DAV 33.497% 37.151% 8.7483% —— DAV
VMI 66.503% 62.849% 91.2517% VMI ——
Team Final Score Act. yds vs act. spread Game should’ve been.. Actual Margin Post game margin Closing Total Closing Spread Post game W/L Projection Margin
MRMK 20.00 Better than predicted Lower Scoring 22 20.64 53 23.50 Should have lost by 20.64
HC 42.00 Worse than predicted Lower Scoring -22 -20.64 53 -23.50 Should have won by 20.64
Team Post game total Actual Points Scored OFF Plays Actual Yds Score should’ve been.. TO Adjusted TO 1st Downs Next Week
MRMK 56.39 62 79.00 351 17.87 0 -1.96 27.00 GOOD
HC 56.39 62 48.00 432 38.51 1 1.00 22.00 BAD
Team ATS Rush Att Rushing Yards Comp-Att Passing Yards Yards per pass Yards per play 3rd Down EFF Penalties
MRMK Won ATS 49 175.00 15-30 176.00 5.9 4.44 7-15 8-94
HC Lost ATS 34 242.00 9-14 190.00 13.6 9.00 4-6 11-91
Pre game W EXP. Actual Post Game W EXP. Play Fade
MRMK 6.166% 7.456% 8.7943% —— ——
HC 93.834% 92.544% 91.2057% —— ——
Team Final Score Act. yds vs act. spread Game should’ve been.. Actual Margin Post game margin Closing Total Closing Spread Post game W/L Projection Margin
BUT 20.00 Better than predicted Higher Scoring 15 28.72 54 34.50 Should have lost by 28.72
MONT 35.00 Worse than predicted Higher Scoring -15 -28.72 54 -34.50 Should have won by 28.72
Team Post game total Actual Points Scored OFF Plays Actual Yds Score should’ve been.. TO Adjusted TO 1st Downs Next Week
BUT 56.85 55 62.00 304 14.06 2 -0.88 15.00 GOOD
MONT 56.85 55 74.00 441 42.78 2 2.00 24.00 BAD
Team ATS Rush Att Rushing Yards Comp-Att Passing Yards Yards per pass Yards per play 3rd Down EFF Penalties
BUT Won ATS 26 41.00 24-36 263.00 7.3 4.90 2-13 5-45
MONT Lost ATS 45 230.00 17-29 211.00 7.3 5.96 6-15 11-91
Pre game W EXP. Actual Post Game W EXP. Play Fade
BUT 1.184% 16.265% 2.9815% —— ——
MONT 98.816% 83.735% 97.0185% —— ——
Team Final Score Act. yds vs act. spread Game should’ve been.. Actual Margin Post game margin Closing Total Closing Spread Post game W/L Projection Margin
GRAM 31.00 Worse than predicted Lower Scoring 4 8.15 49 4.50 Should have lost by 8.15
HAMP 35.00 Better than predicted Lower Scoring -4 -8.15 49 -4.50 Should have won by 8.15
Team Post game total Actual Points Scored OFF Plays Actual Yds Score should’ve been.. TO Adjusted TO 1st Downs Next Week
GRAM 58.38 66 67.00 411 25.12 0 -0.38 19.00 FADE
HAMP 58.38 66 68.00 434 33.26 2 2.00 26.00 PLAY
Team ATS Rush Att Rushing Yards Comp-Att Passing Yards Yards per pass Yards per play 3rd Down EFF Penalties
GRAM Won ATS 29 100.00 25-38 311.00 8.2 6.13 7-13 9-85
HAMP Lost ATS 47 279.00 14-21 155.00 7.4 6.38 6-13 11-91
Pre game W EXP. Actual Post Game W EXP. Play Fade
GRAM 38.397% 39.655% 29.6568% —— GRAM
HAMP 61.603% 60.345% 70.3432% HAMP ——
Team Final Score Act. yds vs act. spread Game should’ve been.. Actual Margin Post game margin Closing Total Closing Spread Post game W/L Projection Margin
EWU 10.00 Worse than predicted Higher Scoring 25 24.71 59 24.50 Should have lost by 24.71
NDSU 35.00 Better than predicted Higher Scoring -25 -24.71 59 -24.50 Should have won by 24.71
Team Post game total Actual Points Scored OFF Plays Actual Yds Score should’ve been.. TO Adjusted TO 1st Downs Next Week
EWU 62.51 45 67.00 338 18.90 1 -1.04 16.00 BAD
NDSU 62.51 45 67.00 513 43.61 0 0.00 22.00 GOOD
Team ATS Rush Att Rushing Yards Comp-Att Passing Yards Yards per pass Yards per play 3rd Down EFF Penalties
EWU Lost ATS 28 72.00 23-39 266.00 6.8 5.04 5-17 8-57
NDSU Won ATS 39 337.00 19-28 176.00 6.3 7.66 8-14 11-91
Pre game W EXP. Actual Post Game W EXP. Play Fade
EWU 5.408% 5.057% 5.2546% —— ——
NDSU 94.592% 94.943% 94.7454% —— ——
Team Final Score Act. yds vs act. spread Game should’ve been.. Actual Margin Post game margin Closing Total Closing Spread Post game W/L Projection Margin
DRKE 7.00 Worse than predicted Higher Scoring 48 44.26 51.5 34.50 Should have lost by 44.26
UND 55.00 Better than predicted Higher Scoring -48 -44.26 51.5 -34.50 Should have won by 44.26
Team Post game total Actual Points Scored OFF Plays Actual Yds Score should’ve been.. TO Adjusted TO 1st Downs Next Week
DRKE 77.50 62 70.00 332 16.62 2 -0.88 14.00 BAD
UND 77.50 62 65.00 652 60.88 1 1.00 29.00 GOOD
Team ATS Rush Att Rushing Yards Comp-Att Passing Yards Yards per pass Yards per play 3rd Down EFF Penalties
DRKE Lost ATS 26 106.00 18-44 226.00 5.1 4.74 6-18 6-50
UND Won ATS 34 288.00 26-31 364.00 11.7 10.03 6-9 11-91
Pre game W EXP. Actual Post Game W EXP. Play Fade
DRKE 1.184% 0.082% 0.1853% —— ——
UND 98.816% 99.918% 99.8147% —— ——
Team Final Score Act. yds vs act. spread Game should’ve been.. Actual Margin Post game margin Closing Total Closing Spread Post game W/L Projection Margin
LAF 19.00 Better than predicted Higher Scoring -5 -2.28 38.5 5.50 Should have won by 2.28
SHU 14.00 Worse than predicted Higher Scoring 5 2.28 38.5 -5.50 Should have lost by 2.28
Team Post game total Actual Points Scored OFF Plays Actual Yds Score should’ve been.. TO Adjusted TO 1st Downs Next Week
LAF 37.61 33 50.00 292 19.94 2 1.54 20.00 GOOD
SHU 37.61 33 67.00 254 17.67 1 1.00 18.00 BAD
Team ATS Rush Att Rushing Yards Comp-Att Passing Yards Yards per pass Yards per play 3rd Down EFF Penalties
LAF Won ATS 35 223.00 8-15 69.00 4.6 5.84 3-9 7-65
SHU Lost ATS 39 116.00 17-28 138.00 4.9 3.79 9-18 11-91
Pre game W EXP. Actual Post Game W EXP. Play Fade
LAF 35.918% 62.849% 55.9357% —— ——
SHU 64.082% 37.151% 44.0643% —— ——
Team Final Score Act. yds vs act. spread Game should’ve been.. Actual Margin Post game margin Closing Total Closing Spread Post game W/L Projection Margin
WAG 16.00 Better than predicted Higher Scoring 30 17.20 56.5 27.50 Should have lost by 17.20
FOR 46.00 Worse than predicted Higher Scoring -30 -17.20 56.5 -27.50 Should have won by 17.20
Team Post game total Actual Points Scored OFF Plays Actual Yds Score should’ve been.. TO Adjusted TO 1st Downs Next Week
WAG 68.70 62 66.00 432 25.75 3 0.71 15.00 PLAY
FOR 68.70 62 78.00 513 42.95 0 0.00 27.00 FADE
Team ATS Rush Att Rushing Yards Comp-Att Passing Yards Yards per pass Yards per play 3rd Down EFF Penalties
WAG Lost ATS 27 88.00 20-39 344.00 8.8 6.55 4-14 8-55
FOR Won ATS 47 194.00 24-31 319.00 10.3 6.58 8-14 11-91
Pre game W EXP. Actual Post Game W EXP. Play Fade
WAG 3.567% 2.458% 12.9696% WAG ——
FOR 96.433% 97.542% 87.0304% —— FOR
Team Final Score Act. yds vs act. spread Game should’ve been.. Actual Margin Post game margin Closing Total Closing Spread Post game W/L Projection Margin
SOU 10.00 Better than predicted Higher Scoring 4 -6.87 42.5 -2.50 Should have won by 6.87
ALST 14.00 Worse than predicted Higher Scoring -4 6.87 42.5 2.50 Should have lost by 6.87
Team Post game total Actual Points Scored OFF Plays Actual Yds Score should’ve been.. TO Adjusted TO 1st Downs Next Week
SOU 34.53 24 62.00 235 20.70 4 4.00 15.00 PLAY
ALST 34.53 24 58.00 266 13.83 0 -0.21 13.00 FADE
Team ATS Rush Att Rushing Yards Comp-Att Passing Yards Yards per pass Yards per play 3rd Down EFF Penalties
SOU Lost ATS 27 69.00 17-35 166.00 4.7 3.79 4-14 6-50
ALST Won ATS 37 86.00 15-21 180.00 8.6 4.59 5-13 11-91
Pre game W EXP. Actual Post Game W EXP. Play Fade
SOU 56.511% 39.655% 67.3917% SOU ——
ALST 43.489% 60.345% 32.6083% —— ALST
Team Final Score Act. yds vs act. spread Game should’ve been.. Actual Margin Post game margin Closing Total Closing Spread Post game W/L Projection Margin
USD 10.00 Worse than predicted Higher Scoring 17 24.23 53.5 19.50 Should have lost by 24.23
CP 27.00 Better than predicted Higher Scoring -17 -24.23 53.5 -19.50 Should have won by 24.23
Team Post game total Actual Points Scored OFF Plays Actual Yds Score should’ve been.. TO Adjusted TO 1st Downs Next Week
USD 48.28 37 61.00 241 12.03 1 -0.63 11.00 FADE
CP 48.28 37 69.00 422 36.25 2 2.00 22.00 PLAY
Team ATS Rush Att Rushing Yards Comp-Att Passing Yards Yards per pass Yards per play 3rd Down EFF Penalties
USD Won ATS 34 96.00 15-27 145.00 5.4 3.95 4-16 11-95
CP Lost ATS 27 96.00 24-42 326.00 7.8 6.12 3-10 11-91
Pre game W EXP. Actual Post Game W EXP. Play Fade
USD 10.050% 13.248% 5.6084% —— USD
CP 89.950% 86.752% 94.3916% CP ——
Team Final Score Act. yds vs act. spread Game should’ve been.. Actual Margin Post game margin Closing Total Closing Spread Post game W/L Projection Margin
APSU 23.00 Worse than predicted Lower Scoring 26 12.08 55 7.50 Should have lost by 12.08
SIU 49.00 Better than predicted Lower Scoring -26 -12.08 55 -7.50 Should have won by 12.08
Team Post game total Actual Points Scored OFF Plays Actual Yds Score should’ve been.. TO Adjusted TO 1st Downs Next Week
APSU 48.01 72 57.00 253 17.97 3 2.38 18.00 BAD
SIU 48.01 72 74.00 432 30.04 1 1.00 23.00 GOOD
Team ATS Rush Att Rushing Yards Comp-Att Passing Yards Yards per pass Yards per play 3rd Down EFF Penalties
APSU Lost ATS 23 39.00 20-34 214.00 6.3 4.44 3-12 6-60
SIU Won ATS 44 169.00 20-30 263.00 8.8 5.84 5-12 11-91
Pre game W EXP. Actual Post Game W EXP. Play Fade
APSU 31.143% 4.410% 21.4180% —— ——
SIU 68.857% 95.590% 78.5820% —— ——
Team Final Score Act. yds vs act. spread Game should’ve been.. Actual Margin Post game margin Closing Total Closing Spread Post game W/L Projection Margin
UTC 27.00 Worse than predicted Higher Scoring 14 -10.71 53 -19.50 Should have won by 10.71
UNA 41.00 Better than predicted Higher Scoring -14 10.71 53 19.50 Should have lost by 10.71
Team Post game total Actual Points Scored OFF Plays Actual Yds Score should’ve been.. TO Adjusted TO 1st Downs Next Week
UTC 70.31 68 88.00 488 40.51 1 1.00 29.00 BAD
UNA 70.31 68 64.00 517 29.80 1 -0.63 21.00 GOOD
Team ATS Rush Att Rushing Yards Comp-Att Passing Yards Yards per pass Yards per play 3rd Down EFF Penalties
UTC Lost ATS 42 177.00 22-46 311.00 6.8 5.55 5-16 6-62
UNA Won ATS 35 246.00 16-29 271.00 9.3 8.08 2-12 11-91
Pre game W EXP. Actual Post Game W EXP. Play Fade
UTC 89.950% 17.930% 75.8668% —— ——
UNA 10.050% 82.070% 24.1332% —— ——
Team Final Score Act. yds vs act. spread Game should’ve been.. Actual Margin Post game margin Closing Total Closing Spread Post game W/L Projection Margin
PRES 10.00 Worse than predicted Higher Scoring 31 33.00 54.5 28.50 Should have lost by 33.00
MUR 41.00 Better than predicted Higher Scoring -31 -33.00 54.5 -28.50 Should have won by 33.00
Team Post game total Actual Points Scored OFF Plays Actual Yds Score should’ve been.. TO Adjusted TO 1st Downs Next Week
PRES 52.84 51 47.00 196 9.92 1 -1.38 11.00 BAD
MUR 52.84 51 68.00 484 42.92 0 0.00 21.00 GOOD
Team ATS Rush Att Rushing Yards Comp-Att Passing Yards Yards per pass Yards per play 3rd Down EFF Penalties
PRES Lost ATS 23 97.00 11-24 99.00 4.1 4.17 3-12 4-35
MUR Won ATS 44 231.00 14-24 253.00 10.5 7.12 8-15 11-91
Pre game W EXP. Actual Post Game W EXP. Play Fade
PRES 3.082% 2.104% 1.5239% —— ——
MUR 96.918% 97.896% 98.4761% —— ——
Team Final Score Act. yds vs act. spread Game should’ve been.. Actual Margin Post game margin Closing Total Closing Spread Post game W/L Projection Margin
PV 37.00 Worse than predicted Lower Scoring -3 3.99 54.5 -3.50 Should have lost by 3.99
TXSO 34.00 Better than predicted Lower Scoring 3 -3.99 54.5 3.50 Should have won by 3.99
Team Post game total Actual Points Scored OFF Plays Actual Yds Score should’ve been.. TO Adjusted TO 1st Downs Next Week
PV 64.88 71 86.00 455 30.45 2 2.00 27.00 BAD
TXSO 64.88 71 66.00 486 34.44 4 3.71 20.00 GOOD
Team ATS Rush Att Rushing Yards Comp-Att Passing Yards Yards per pass Yards per play 3rd Down EFF Penalties
PV Lost ATS 53 180.00 20-33 275.00 8.3 5.29 9-20 3-41
TXSO Won ATS 28 200.00 18-38 286.00 7.5 7.36 4-11 11-91
Pre game W EXP. Actual Post Game W EXP. Play Fade
PV 59.076% 57.798% 39.6839% —— ——
TXSO 40.924% 42.202% 60.3161% —— ——
Team Final Score Act. yds vs act. spread Game should’ve been.. Actual Margin Post game margin Closing Total Closing Spread Post game W/L Projection Margin
UTU 20.00 Worse than predicted Lower Scoring 43 38.34 60.5 32.00 Should have lost by 38.34
MTST 63.00 Better than predicted Lower Scoring -43 -38.34 60.5 -32.00 Should have won by 38.34
Team Post game total Actual Points Scored OFF Plays Actual Yds Score should’ve been.. TO Adjusted TO 1st Downs Next Week
UTU 73.92 83 56.00 309 17.79 3 0.33 16.00 BAD
MTST 73.92 83 71.00 638 56.13 0 0.00 29.00 GOOD
Team ATS Rush Att Rushing Yards Comp-Att Passing Yards Yards per pass Yards per play 3rd Down EFF Penalties
UTU Lost ATS 15 49.00 21-41 260.00 6.3 5.52 4-11 7-31
MTST Won ATS 53 407.00 12-18 231.00 12.8 8.99 9-12 11-91
Pre game W EXP. Actual Post Game W EXP. Play Fade
UTU 1.794% 0.240% 0.5971% —— ——
MTST 98.206% 99.760% 99.4029% —— ——
Team Final Score Act. yds vs act. spread Game should’ve been.. Actual Margin Post game margin Closing Total Closing Spread Post game W/L Projection Margin
TAR 52.00 Better than predicted Lower Scoring -18 -25.01 54.5 -3.50 Should have won by 25.01
MCN 34.00 Worse than predicted Lower Scoring 18 25.01 54.5 3.50 Should have lost by 25.01
Team Post game total Actual Points Scored OFF Plays Actual Yds Score should’ve been.. TO Adjusted TO 1st Downs Next Week
TAR 57.87 86 74.00 554 41.44 3 3.00 30.00 GOOD
MCN 57.87 86 78.00 278 16.43 1 0.71 18.00 BAD
Team ATS Rush Att Rushing Yards Comp-Att Passing Yards Yards per pass Yards per play 3rd Down EFF Penalties
TAR Won ATS 40 210.00 20-34 344.00 10.1 7.49 8-12 9-71
MCN Lost ATS 37 89.00 18-41 189.00 4.6 3.56 4-19 11-91
Pre game W EXP. Actual Post Game W EXP. Play Fade
TAR 59.076% 88.107% 94.9530% —— ——
MCN 40.924% 11.893% 5.0470% —— ——
Team Final Score Act. yds vs act. spread Game should’ve been.. Actual Margin Post game margin Closing Total Closing Spread Post game W/L Projection Margin
JKST 10.00 Worse than predicted Higher Scoring 18 -1.89 45.5 -3.50 Should have won by 1.89
FAMU 28.00 Better than predicted Higher Scoring -18 1.89 45.5 3.50 Should have lost by 1.89
Team Post game total Actual Points Scored OFF Plays Actual Yds Score should’ve been.. TO Adjusted TO 1st Downs Next Week
JKST 45.52 38 66.00 303 23.71 2 2.00 17.00 BAD
FAMU 45.52 38 61.00 358 21.82 0 -0.29 18.00 GOOD
Team ATS Rush Att Rushing Yards Comp-Att Passing Yards Yards per pass Yards per play 3rd Down EFF Penalties
JKST Lost ATS 32 72.00 20-34 231.00 6.8 4.59 2-14 4-30
FAMU Won ATS 39 208.00 12-22 150.00 6.8 5.87 6-13 11-91
Pre game W EXP. Actual Post Game W EXP. Play Fade
JKST 59.076% 11.893% 54.9291% —— ——
FAMU 40.924% 88.107% 45.0709% —— ——

 

Updated: September 6, 2023 — 4:56 pm
© 2018