NCAA Box Score Analysis
The chart below is taking a look at the previous week’s box scores and showing who may have overachieved or underachieved based on stats.
The program generates an “expected” margin of victory, using actual final game stats, and compares that to the:
1. Las Vegas line (pre-game prediction)
2. Actual margin of victory
So if a team meets or exceeds pre game expectations, by the actual play on the field, they are rewarded. However if they win or lose and are statistically dominated this program will show that.
Key: 1. ATS– Against the spread.
2. Act. Yds vs Act. Spread –How each team did using their yardage stats and turnovers.
3. Game should’ve been.. — A scoring projection based on total yards gained using yards per point.
4. Win Margin—Final game margin.
5. Yds/TO spread conv.— A spread projection using total yards gained/allowed and turnovers.
6. Game tot—Acutal game total.
7. Yppt. Total—A total projection of how many points should’ve been scored based on yards.
8. W/L Projection—An estimation of the final score using actual yards and turnover margin. 9. Margin—A number each team “should’ve” won/loss by.
10. Actual Yds—Total yards gained in the game by the offense. 11. Score should’ve been..—A projection for a score based on the game stats and turnovers.
12. TO—Adjusted TO based on actual and pre-game projection.
13. Next Week—A computer generated suggestion for how a team may do next week. (Good, Bad, Play, Fade)
Good—Played as they were projected to do in the game.
Bad—Played below expectations for the game.
Fade—Played well below expectations for the game.
Play—Played better than final score and should be looked at next week.
(Good/Bad/Fade/Play are just suggestions to look at as a guide. Don’t just automatically use them as they are listed. They are to be used to help not as a magic formula)
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Wake Forest | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Lower Scoring | -20 | -22.61 | 62 | -19.50 | 8.27 | 62 |
| Rice | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Lower Scoring | 20 | 22.61 | 62 | 19.50 | 4.46 | 72 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Wake Forest | 60.39 | Should have won by | 22.61 | 513 | 41.50 | 0 | 0.00 | 19.00 | GOOD |
| Rice | 60.39 | Should have lost by | 22.61 | 321 | 18.89 | 1 | -0.63 | 20.00 | BAD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Wake Forest | YES | YES | —— | YES | —— | —— | —— | 7-for-14 | 5-38 |
| Rice | —— | —— | YES | —— | YES | YES | YES | 4-for-16 | 2-12 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Marshall | Won ATS | Worse than predicted | Higher Scoring | 7 | 24.87 | 21 | 14.00 | 4.00 | 43 |
| Boise State | Lost ATS | Better than predicted | Higher Scoring | -7 | -24.87 | 21 | -14.00 | 5.40 | 81 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Marshall | 44.18 | Should have lost by | 24.87 | 172 | 9.65 | 2 | 0.83 | 9.00 | FADE |
| Boise State | 44.18 | Should have won by | 24.87 | 437 | 34.53 | 2 | 2.00 | 22.00 | PLAY |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Marshall | —— | —— | —— | —— | YES | —— | —— | 2-for-9 | 6-45 |
| Boise State | YES | YES | YES | YES | —— | YES | YES | 10-for-17 | 3-36 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| William & Mary | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Lower Scoring | 35 | 45.97 | 69 | 32.50 | 4.02 | 48 |
| Virginia | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Lower Scoring | -35 | -45.97 | 69 | -32.50 | 7.20 | 71 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| William & Mary | 56.30 | Should have lost by | 45.97 | 193 | 5.16 | 1 | -1.71 | 8.00 | BAD |
| Virginia | 56.30 | Should have won by | 45.97 | 511 | 51.13 | 4 | 4.00 | 25.00 | GOOD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| William & Mary | —— | —— | —— | —— | YES | —— | —— | 1-for-11 | 4-20 |
| Virginia | YES | YES | YES | YES | —— | YES | —— | 9-for-14 | 3-31 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Sacramento State | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Higher Scoring | 12 | 23.09 | 26 | 35.50 | 4.18 | 73 |
| Arizona State | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Higher Scoring | -12 | -23.09 | 26 | -35.50 | 5.98 | 66 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Sacramento State | 52.97 | Should have lost by | 23.09 | 305 | 14.94 | 2 | -0.96 | 16.00 | GOOD |
| Arizona State | 52.97 | Should have won by | 23.09 | 395 | 38.03 | 1 | 1.00 | 15.00 | BAD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Sacramento State | —— | —— | YES | —— | YES | YES | —— | 4-for-14 | 8-64 |
| Arizona State | YES | YES | —— | YES | —— | —— | YES | 5-for-17 | 4-60 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Ohio | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Higher Scoring | 10 | 20.55 | 30 | 4.00 | 3.79 | 56 |
| Pittsburgh | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Higher Scoring | -10 | -20.55 | 30 | -4.00 | 6.50 | 74 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Ohio | 48.34 | Should have lost by | 20.55 | 212 | 13.89 | 0 | -0.33 | 12.00 | BAD |
| Pittsburgh | 48.34 | Should have won by | 20.55 | 481 | 34.45 | 0 | 0.00 | 22.00 | GOOD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Ohio | —— | —— | —— | —— | YES | —— | —— | 4-for-15 | 5-34 |
| Pittsburgh | YES | YES | YES | YES | —— | YES | YES | 5-for-14 | 10-75 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Old Dominion | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Higher Scoring | 14 | 24.90 | 48 | 29.00 | 4.51 | 72 |
| Virginia Tech | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Higher Scoring | -14 | -24.90 | 48 | -29.00 | 6.01 | 67 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Old Dominion | 53.42 | Should have lost by | 24.90 | 325 | 14.26 | 0 | -2.42 | 19.00 | GOOD |
| Virginia Tech | 53.42 | Should have won by | 24.90 | 403 | 39.16 | 2 | 2.00 | 21.00 | BAD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Old Dominion | —— | —— | YES | —— | YES | —— | YES | 4-for-15 | 6-66 |
| Virginia Tech | YES | YES | —— | YES | —— | YES | —— | 8-for-13 | 6-65 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| UAB | Won ATS | Worse than predicted | Higher Scoring | -11 | -2.72 | 51 | -7.50 | 6.93 | 58 |
| Akron | Lost ATS | Better than predicted | Higher Scoring | 11 | 2.72 | 51 | 7.50 | 5.38 | 73 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| UAB | 55.01 | Should have won by | 2.72 | 402 | 28.86 | 1 | 1.00 | 15.00 | FADE |
| Akron | 55.01 | Should have lost by | 2.72 | 393 | 26.15 | 2 | 1.38 | 16.00 | PLAY |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| UAB | YES | YES | —— | YES | YES | —— | YES | 4-for-14 | 4-35 |
| Akron | —— | —— | YES | —— | —— | YES | —— | 4-for-16 | 6-56 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Army | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Lower Scoring | 3 | 17.00 | 45 | 22.50 | 3.68 | 66 |
| Michigan | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Lower Scoring | -3 | -17.00 | 45 | -22.50 | 4.47 | 76 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Army | 42.26 | Should have lost by | 17.00 | 243 | 12.63 | 3 | 1.13 | 15.00 | GOOD |
| Michigan | 42.26 | Should have won by | 17.00 | 340 | 29.63 | 3 | 3.00 | 23.00 | BAD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Army | —— | —— | —— | —— | YES | —— | YES | 5-for-16 | 8-78 |
| Michigan | YES | YES | YES | YES | —— | YES | —— | 9-for-16 | 9-58 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Vanderbilt | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Higher Scoring | 18 | 8.21 | 66 | 7.00 | 6.55 | 75 |
| Purdue | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Higher Scoring | -18 | -8.21 | 66 | -7.00 | 7.87 | 69 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Vanderbilt | 71.65 | Should have lost by | 8.21 | 491 | 31.72 | 1 | 0.42 | 23.00 | BAD |
| Purdue | 71.65 | Should have won by | 8.21 | 543 | 39.93 | 1 | 1.00 | 27.00 | GOOD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Vanderbilt | —— | —— | YES | —— | YES | —— | YES | 6-for-15 | 13-100 |
| Purdue | YES | YES | —— | YES | —— | YES | —— | 5-for-11 | 8-63 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Rutgers | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Higher Scoring | 30 | 23.82 | 30 | 18.00 | 2.55 | 49 |
| Iowa | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Higher Scoring | -30 | -23.82 | 30 | -18.00 | 6.00 | 73 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Rutgers | 42.16 | Should have lost by | 23.82 | 125 | 9.17 | 3 | 1.50 | 5.00 | BAD |
| Iowa | 42.16 | Should have won by | 23.82 | 438 | 32.99 | 0 | 0.00 | 23.00 | GOOD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Rutgers | —— | —— | —— | —— | —— | —— | —— | 2-for-14 | 7-61 |
| Iowa | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | 2-for-13 | 4-37 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Syracuse | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Lower Scoring | 43 | 16.24 | 83 | 1.50 | 5.71 | 70 |
| Maryland | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Lower Scoring | -43 | -16.24 | 83 | -1.50 | 7.83 | 83 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Syracuse | 72.60 | Should have lost by | 16.24 | 400 | 28.18 | 2 | 1.88 | 18.00 | BAD |
| Maryland | 72.60 | Should have won by | 16.24 | 650 | 44.42 | 1 | 1.00 | 29.00 | GOOD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Syracuse | —— | —— | —— | —— | —— | —— | —— | 6-for-15 | 6-35 |
| Maryland | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | 11-for-15 | 5-30 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| West Virginia | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Lower Scoring | 31 | 14.51 | 45 | 13.50 | 2.90 | 59 |
| Missouri | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Lower Scoring | -31 | -14.51 | 45 | -13.50 | 4.90 | 78 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| West Virginia | 39.84 | Should have lost by | 14.51 | 171 | 12.66 | 3 | 1.88 | 13.00 | BAD |
| Missouri | 39.84 | Should have won by | 14.51 | 382 | 27.17 | 0 | 0.00 | 26.00 | GOOD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| West Virginia | —— | —— | —— | —— | —— | —— | —— | 7-for-16 | 4-40 |
| Missouri | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | 7-for-15 | 10-100 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Cincinnati | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Higher Scoring | 42 | 20.23 | 42 | 14.50 | 4.79 | 57 |
| Ohio State | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Higher Scoring | -42 | -20.23 | 42 | -14.50 | 6.96 | 73 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Cincinnati | 56.04 | Should have lost by | 20.23 | 273 | 17.91 | 2 | 0.79 | 13.00 | BAD |
| Ohio State | 56.04 | Should have won by | 20.23 | 508 | 38.14 | 0 | 0.00 | 31.00 | GOOD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Cincinnati | —— | —— | —— | —— | —— | —— | —— | 3-for-14 | 10-78 |
| Ohio State | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | 7-for-11 | 2-25 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Bowling Green | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Lower Scoring | 52 | 39.35 | 52 | 25.00 | 3.18 | 44 |
| Kansas State | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Lower Scoring | -52 | -39.35 | 52 | -25.00 | 6.77 | 77 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Bowling Green | 51.65 | Should have lost by | 39.35 | 140 | 6.15 | 1 | -1.08 | 5.00 | BAD |
| Kansas State | 51.65 | Should have won by | 39.35 | 521 | 45.50 | 1 | 1.00 | 25.00 | GOOD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Bowling Green | —— | —— | —— | —— | YES | —— | —— | 0-for-11 | 6-50 |
| Kansas State | YES | YES | YES | YES | —— | YES | YES | 9-for-16 | 4-35 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Northern Illinois | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Lower Scoring | 18 | 17.22 | 52 | 23.00 | 5.39 | 56 |
| Utah | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Lower Scoring | -18 | -17.22 | 52 | -23.00 | 7.27 | 56 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Northern Illinois | 51.34 | Should have lost by | 17.22 | 302 | 17.06 | 1 | -0.92 | 14.00 | GOOD |
| Utah | 51.34 | Should have won by | 17.22 | 407 | 34.28 | 0 | 0.00 | 19.00 | BAD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Northern Illinois | —— | —— | —— | —— | YES | —— | —— | 2-for-12 | 6-50 |
| Utah | YES | YES | —— | YES | —— | YES | YES | 5-for-11 | 1-10 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| South Florida | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Higher Scoring | 4 | 1.58 | 24 | 4.50 | 4.75 | 55 |
| Georgia Tech | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Higher Scoring | -4 | -1.58 | 24 | -4.50 | 3.67 | 70 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| South Florida | 35.75 | Should have lost by | 1.58 | 261 | 17.08 | 2 | 1.63 | 11.00 | GOOD |
| Georgia Tech | 35.75 | Should have won by | 1.58 | 257 | 18.67 | 2 | 2.00 | 21.00 | BAD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| South Florida | —— | YES | —— | YES | YES | —— | —— | 4-for-15 | 9-95 |
| Georgia Tech | YES | —— | YES | —— | —— | YES | YES | 5-for-14 | 2-20 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Tulsa | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Higher Scoring | -18 | -14.73 | 50 | -6.00 | 6.57 | 82 |
| San Jose State | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Higher Scoring | 18 | 14.73 | 50 | 6.00 | 5.12 | 68 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Tulsa | 61.82 | Should have won by | 14.73 | 539 | 38.28 | 0 | 0.00 | 27.00 | GOOD |
| San Jose State | 61.82 | Should have lost by | 14.73 | 348 | 23.55 | 1 | 0.50 | 18.00 | BAD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Tulsa | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | 9-for-16 | 12-105 |
| San Jose State | —— | —— | —— | —— | —— | —— | —— | 6-for-15 | 4-35 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Nebraska | Lost ATS | Better than predicted | Lower Scoring | 3 | -5.09 | 65 | -4.50 | 6.51 | 72 |
| Colorado | Won ATS | Worse than predicted | Lower Scoring | -3 | 5.09 | 65 | 4.50 | 5.95 | 78 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Nebraska | 64.42 | Should have won by | 5.09 | 469 | 34.76 | 3 | 3.00 | 19.00 | PLAY |
| Colorado | 64.42 | Should have lost by | 5.09 | 464 | 29.66 | 2 | 1.63 | 22.00 | FADE |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Nebraska | —— | YES | —— | YES | —— | —— | YES | 5-for-15 | 7-65 |
| Colorado | YES | —— | YES | —— | YES | YES | —— | 6-for-17 | 9-65 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Texas A&M | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Higher Scoring | 14 | 12.87 | 34 | 16.00 | 4.19 | 69 |
| Clemson | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Higher Scoring | -14 | -12.87 | 34 | -16.00 | 5.72 | 68 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Texas A&M | 48.11 | Should have lost by | 12.87 | 289 | 17.62 | 2 | 0.67 | 18.00 | GOOD |
| Clemson | 48.11 | Should have won by | 12.87 | 389 | 30.49 | 1 | 1.00 | 26.00 | BAD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Texas A&M | —— | —— | YES | —— | YES | —— | —— | 6-for-16 | 9-85 |
| Clemson | YES | YES | —— | YES | —— | YES | YES | 3-for-9 | 4-30 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Central Michigan | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Lower Scoring | 61 | 55.78 | 61 | 34.50 | 1.70 | 44 |
| Wisconsin | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Lower Scoring | -61 | -55.78 | 61 | -34.50 | 7.30 | 82 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Central Michigan | 58.39 | Should have lost by | 55.78 | 75 | 1.30 | 1 | -1.88 | 3.00 | BAD |
| Wisconsin | 58.39 | Should have won by | 55.78 | 599 | 57.08 | 1 | 1.00 | 37.00 | GOOD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Central Michigan | —— | —— | —— | —— | YES | —— | —— | 1-for-14 | 6-39 |
| Wisconsin | YES | YES | YES | YES | —— | YES | YES | 11-for-13 | 1-10 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Charlotte | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Lower Scoring | 15 | 5.98 | 97 | 23.50 | 7.40 | 72 |
| Appalachian State | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Lower Scoring | -15 | -5.98 | 97 | -23.50 | 7.76 | 59 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Charlotte | 69.33 | Should have lost by | 5.98 | 533 | 31.67 | 2 | 0.04 | 24.00 | GOOD |
| Appalachian State | 69.33 | Should have won by | 5.98 | 458 | 37.65 | 0 | 0.00 | 16.00 | BAD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Charlotte | —— | YES | YES | —— | —— | YES | YES | 4-for-12 | 11-80 |
| Appalachian State | YES | —— | —— | YES | YES | —— | —— | 6-for-13 | 13-143 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Southern Mississippi | Lost ATS | Better than predicted | Lower Scoring | 23 | 5.49 | 53 | 16.50 | 6.49 | 53 |
| Mississippi State | Won ATS | Worse than predicted | Lower Scoring | -23 | -5.49 | 53 | -16.50 | 6.23 | 62 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Southern Mississippi | 51.34 | Should have lost by | 5.49 | 344 | 22.93 | 3 | 1.63 | 17.00 | PLAY |
| Mississippi State | 51.34 | Should have won by | 5.49 | 386 | 28.41 | 0 | 0.00 | 21.00 | FADE |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Southern Mississippi | —— | —— | —— | YES | —— | —— | —— | 2-for-9 | 1-5 |
| Mississippi State | YES | YES | YES | —— | YES | YES | YES | 3-for-9 | 2-10 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Illinois | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Lower Scoring | -8 | -15.62 | 54 | -21.50 | 5.29 | 68 |
| Connecticut | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Lower Scoring | 8 | 15.62 | 54 | 21.50 | 4.75 | 60 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Illinois | 46.27 | Should have won by | 15.62 | 360 | 30.94 | 3 | 3.00 | 21.00 | BAD |
| Connecticut | 46.27 | Should have lost by | 15.62 | 285 | 15.33 | 3 | 1.21 | 16.00 | GOOD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Illinois | YES | YES | YES | YES | —— | YES | YES | 6-for-11 | 9-98 |
| Connecticut | —— | —— | —— | —— | YES | —— | —— | 6-for-15 | 4-34 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Arkansas State | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Lower Scoring | -26 | -12.20 | 60 | -1.00 | 6.23 | 80 |
| UNLV | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Lower Scoring | 26 | 12.20 | 60 | 1.00 | 4.41 | 68 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Arkansas State | 55.13 | Should have won by | 12.20 | 498 | 33.67 | 0 | 0.00 | 23.00 | GOOD |
| UNLV | 55.13 | Should have lost by | 12.20 | 300 | 21.46 | 1 | 0.92 | 14.00 | BAD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Arkansas State | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | 8-for-17 | 4-30 |
| UNLV | —— | —— | —— | —— | —— | —— | —— | 3-for-16 | 3-20 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Texas-San Antonio | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Lower Scoring | 49 | 32.02 | 77 | 25.00 | 4.03 | 66 |
| Baylor | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Lower Scoring | -49 | -32.02 | 77 | -25.00 | 8.81 | 62 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Texas-San Antonio | 61.15 | Should have lost by | 32.02 | 266 | 14.56 | 1 | -1.08 | 14.00 | BAD |
| Baylor | 61.15 | Should have won by | 32.02 | 546 | 46.58 | 0 | 0.00 | 25.00 | GOOD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Texas-San Antonio | —— | —— | YES | —— | YES | —— | —— | 7-for-18 | 7-58 |
| Baylor | YES | YES | —— | YES | —— | YES | YES | 6-for-9 | 6-50 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| New Mexico State | Won ATS | Worse than predicted | Higher Scoring | 52 | 57.07 | 72 | 55.00 | 3.80 | 69 |
| Alabama | Lost ATS | Better than predicted | Higher Scoring | -52 | -57.07 | 72 | -55.00 | 9.28 | 65 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| New Mexico State | 80.10 | Should have lost by | 57.07 | 262 | 11.52 | 3 | -1.58 | 14.00 | FADE |
| Alabama | 80.10 | Should have won by | 57.07 | 603 | 68.58 | 0 | 0.00 | 23.00 | PLAY |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| New Mexico State | —— | —— | YES | —— | YES | —— | YES | 4-for-15 | 1-15 |
| Alabama | YES | YES | —— | YES | —— | YES | —— | 7-for-14 | 4-35 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| San Diego State | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Higher Scoring | -9 | -0.46 | 37 | 7.00 | 4.78 | 78 |
| UCLA | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Higher Scoring | 9 | 0.46 | 37 | -7.00 | 3.90 | 67 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| San Diego State | 43.45 | Should have won by | 0.46 | 373 | 21.96 | 0 | -0.58 | 22.00 | GOOD |
| UCLA | 43.45 | Should have lost by | 0.46 | 261 | 21.50 | 2 | 2.00 | 16.00 | BAD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| San Diego State | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | 6-for-15 | 5-50 |
| UCLA | —— | —— | —— | —— | —— | —— | —— | 5-for-14 | 7-52 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| UL Monroe | Won ATS | Worse than predicted | Lower Scoring | 1 | 23.96 | 89 | 23.00 | 5.30 | 79 |
| Florida State | Lost ATS | Better than predicted | Lower Scoring | -1 | -23.96 | 89 | -23.00 | 5.57 | 90 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| UL Monroe | 66.01 | Should have lost by | 23.96 | 419 | 21.02 | 1 | -0.92 | 26.00 | FADE |
| Florida State | 66.01 | Should have won by | 23.96 | 501 | 44.98 | 3 | 3.00 | 30.00 | PLAY |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| UL Monroe | —— | —— | —— | —— | YES | —— | —— | 6-for-15 | 9-74 |
| Florida State | YES | YES | YES | YES | —— | YES | YES | 10-for-19 | 11-108 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Wyoming | Won ATS | Worse than predicted | Higher Scoring | -9 | 10.56 | 37 | -7.50 | 4.37 | 67 |
| Texas State | Lost ATS | Better than predicted | Higher Scoring | 9 | -10.56 | 37 | 7.50 | 5.84 | 76 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Wyoming | 50.42 | Should have lost by | 10.56 | 293 | 19.93 | 1 | 1.00 | 16.00 | FADE |
| Texas State | 50.42 | Should have won by | 10.56 | 444 | 30.49 | 3 | 2.38 | 27.00 | PLAY |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Wyoming | YES | —— | —— | —— | YES | —— | YES | 8-for-18 | 6-76 |
| Texas State | —— | YES | YES | YES | —— | YES | —— | 5-for-13 | 4-35 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| North Texas | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Lower Scoring | 22 | 9.76 | 76 | 4.00 | 4.95 | 80 |
| Southern Methodist | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Lower Scoring | -22 | -9.76 | 76 | -4.00 | 7.19 | 70 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| North Texas | 62.25 | Should have lost by | 9.76 | 396 | 26.24 | 1 | 0.67 | 21.00 | BAD |
| Southern Methodist | 62.25 | Should have won by | 9.76 | 503 | 36.01 | 1 | 1.00 | 25.00 | GOOD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| North Texas | —— | —— | YES | —— | YES | —— | YES | 5-for-16 | 9-90 |
| Southern Methodist | YES | YES | —— | YES | —— | YES | —— | 6-for-11 | 3-32 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Brigham Young | Won ATS | Worse than predicted | Lower Scoring | -3 | 9.03 | 55 | 3.00 | 5.65 | 60 |
| Tennessee | Lost ATS | Better than predicted | Lower Scoring | 3 | -9.03 | 55 | -3.00 | 5.43 | 77 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Brigham Young | 52.34 | Should have lost by | 9.03 | 339 | 21.66 | 0 | -0.25 | 18.00 | FADE |
| Tennessee | 52.34 | Should have won by | 9.03 | 418 | 30.69 | 1 | 1.00 | 20.00 | PLAY |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Brigham Young | YES | —— | —— | YES | YES | —— | —— | 5-for-13 | 7-63 |
| Tennessee | —— | YES | YES | —— | —— | YES | YES | 5-for-16 | 6-50 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Central Florida | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Higher Scoring | -34 | -24.40 | 62 | -14.00 | 8.57 | 67 |
| Florida Atlantic | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Higher Scoring | 34 | 24.40 | 62 | 14.00 | 3.61 | 87 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Central Florida | 63.57 | Should have won by | 24.40 | 574 | 43.98 | 0 | 0.00 | 23.00 | GOOD |
| Florida Atlantic | 63.57 | Should have lost by | 24.40 | 314 | 19.58 | 1 | -0.17 | 22.00 | BAD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Central Florida | YES | YES | —— | YES | —— | YES | —— | 3-for-12 | 5-55 |
| Florida Atlantic | —— | —— | YES | —— | YES | —— | —— | 5-for-19 | 7-97 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Western Kentucky | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Higher Scoring | -6 | -8.77 | 34 | 8.50 | 4.99 | 68 |
| Florida International | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Higher Scoring | 6 | 8.77 | 34 | -8.50 | 3.39 | 64 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Western Kentucky | 37.98 | Should have won by | 8.77 | 339 | 23.38 | 2 | 1.29 | 17.00 | GOOD |
| Florida International | 37.98 | Should have lost by | 8.77 | 217 | 14.61 | 0 | 0.00 | 14.00 | BAD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Western Kentucky | YES | YES | YES | YES | —— | YES | —— | 5-for-13 | 7-60 |
| Florida International | —— | —— | —— | —— | YES | —— | YES | 2-for-15 | 4-47 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Coastal Carolina | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Higher Scoring | -5 | 6.05 | 19 | 7.00 | 4.76 | 62 |
| Kansas | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Higher Scoring | 5 | -6.05 | 19 | -7.00 | 5.00 | 56 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Coastal Carolina | 39.70 | Should have lost by | 6.05 | 295 | 16.82 | 0 | -0.58 | 20.00 | GOOD |
| Kansas | 39.70 | Should have won by | 6.05 | 280 | 22.87 | 2 | 2.00 | 17.00 | BAD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Coastal Carolina | YES | YES | YES | —— | YES | YES | YES | 1-for-9 | 4-31 |
| Kansas | —— | —— | —— | YES | —— | —— | —— | 4-for-10 | 5-40 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Liberty | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Higher Scoring | 21 | 26.90 | 49 | 14.00 | 5.39 | 67 |
| UL Lafayette | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Higher Scoring | -21 | -26.90 | 49 | -14.00 | 8.35 | 71 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Liberty | 67.97 | Should have lost by | 26.90 | 361 | 20.54 | 1 | -0.17 | 20.00 | BAD |
| UL Lafayette | 67.97 | Should have won by | 26.90 | 593 | 47.43 | 2 | 2.00 | 26.00 | GOOD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Liberty | —— | —— | —— | —— | YES | —— | —— | 2-for-11 | 9-42 |
| UL Lafayette | YES | YES | YES | YES | —— | YES | YES | 6-for-12 | 4-35 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Western Michigan | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Lower Scoring | 34 | 23.27 | 68 | 15.00 | 5.18 | 68 |
| Michigan State | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Lower Scoring | -34 | -23.27 | 68 | -15.00 | 8.69 | 67 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Western Michigan | 66.77 | Should have lost by | 23.27 | 352 | 21.75 | 3 | 1.75 | 18.00 | BAD |
| Michigan State | 66.77 | Should have won by | 23.27 | 582 | 45.02 | 2 | 2.00 | 31.00 | GOOD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Western Michigan | —— | —— | YES | —— | YES | —— | —— | 5-for-16 | 7-46 |
| Michigan State | YES | YES | —— | YES | —— | YES | YES | 7-for-10 | 2-20 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Louisiana State | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Lower Scoring | -7 | -9.47 | 83 | -6.50 | 8.43 | 68 |
| Texas | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Lower Scoring | 7 | 9.47 | 83 | 6.50 | 6.24 | 85 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Louisiana State | 76.36 | Should have won by | 9.47 | 573 | 42.91 | 1 | 1.00 | 28.00 | GOOD |
| Texas | 76.36 | Should have lost by | 9.47 | 530 | 33.44 | 0 | -0.54 | 30.00 | BAD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Louisiana State | YES | YES | —— | YES | —— | —— | —— | 6-for-12 | 6-65 |
| Texas | —— | —— | YES | —— | YES | YES | YES | 8-for-15 | 6-50 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Tulane | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Higher Scoring | 18 | 19.96 | 30 | 15.50 | 3.48 | 64 |
| Auburn | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Higher Scoring | -18 | -19.96 | 30 | -15.50 | 4.62 | 82 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Tulane | 43.16 | Should have lost by | 19.96 | 223 | 11.60 | 1 | -0.29 | 12.00 | BAD |
| Auburn | 43.16 | Should have won by | 19.96 | 379 | 31.56 | 2 | 2.00 | 20.00 | GOOD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Tulane | —— | —— | —— | —— | YES | —— | —— | 2-for-15 | 11-80 |
| Auburn | YES | YES | YES | YES | —— | YES | YES | 10-for-19 | 5-51 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Arkansas | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Higher Scoring | 14 | 13.84 | 48 | 6.00 | 5.39 | 67 |
| Mississippi | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Higher Scoring | -14 | -13.84 | 48 | -6.00 | 6.27 | 77 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Arkansas | 58.66 | Should have lost by | 13.84 | 361 | 22.41 | 1 | 0.50 | 18.00 | BAD |
| Mississippi | 58.66 | Should have won by | 13.84 | 483 | 36.25 | 2 | 2.00 | 25.00 | GOOD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Arkansas | —— | —— | —— | —— | YES | —— | —— | 5-for-15 | 7-55 |
| Mississippi | YES | YES | YES | YES | —— | YES | YES | 8-for-15 | 5-60 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Nevada | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Lower Scoring | 71 | 38.46 | 83 | 24.50 | 2.82 | 68 |
| Oregon | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Lower Scoring | -71 | -38.46 | 83 | -24.50 | 8.42 | 74 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Nevada | 63.03 | Should have lost by | 38.46 | 192 | 12.29 | 4 | 1.96 | 12.00 | BAD |
| Oregon | 63.03 | Should have won by | 38.46 | 623 | 50.74 | 1 | 1.00 | 28.00 | GOOD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Nevada | —— | —— | —— | —— | —— | —— | YES | 3-for-17 | 9-54 |
| Oregon | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | —— | 5-for-12 | 6-34 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Buffalo | Lost ATS | Better than predicted | Lower Scoring | 32 | 10.40 | 58 | 31.50 | 4.77 | 90 |
| Penn State | Won ATS | Worse than predicted | Lower Scoring | -32 | -10.40 | 58 | -31.50 | 7.76 | 46 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Buffalo | 55.76 | Should have lost by | 10.40 | 429 | 22.68 | 2 | -0.63 | 22.00 | PLAY |
| Penn State | 55.76 | Should have won by | 10.40 | 357 | 33.08 | 1 | 1.00 | 14.00 | FADE |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Buffalo | —— | YES | YES | —— | YES | YES | YES | 10-for-23 | 8-78 |
| Penn State | YES | —— | —— | YES | —— | —— | —— | 2-for-9 | 3-25 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Eastern Michigan | Lost ATS | Better than predicted | Higher Scoring | 21 | 12.13 | 55 | 15.50 | 5.15 | 75 |
| Kentucky | Won ATS | Worse than predicted | Higher Scoring | -21 | -12.13 | 55 | -15.50 | 6.15 | 75 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Eastern Michigan | 59.65 | Should have lost by | 12.13 | 386 | 23.76 | 2 | 0.71 | 24.00 | PLAY |
| Kentucky | 59.65 | Should have won by | 12.13 | 461 | 35.89 | 1 | 1.00 | 26.00 | FADE |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Eastern Michigan | —— | —— | —— | —— | YES | —— | —— | 6-for-14 | 5-46 |
| Kentucky | YES | YES | —— | YES | —— | YES | YES | 9-for-14 | 7-84 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Texas El Paso | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Higher Scoring | 35 | 37.83 | 41 | 34.50 | 2.30 | 57 |
| Texas Tech | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Higher Scoring | -35 | -37.83 | 41 | -34.50 | 5.43 | 76 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Texas El Paso | 44.67 | Should have lost by | 37.83 | 131 | 3.42 | 0 | -2.88 | 11.00 | BAD |
| Texas Tech | 44.67 | Should have won by | 37.83 | 413 | 41.25 | 1 | 1.00 | 27.00 | GOOD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Texas El Paso | —— | —— | —— | —— | YES | —— | YES | 2-for-15 | 9-76 |
| Texas Tech | YES | YES | YES | YES | —— | YES | —— | 8-for-14 | 4-50 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Miami | Lost ATS | Better than predicted | Higher Scoring | 3 | -9.46 | 53 | -4.50 | 6.42 | 76 |
| North Carolina | Won ATS | Worse than predicted | Higher Scoring | -3 | 9.46 | 53 | 4.50 | 6.38 | 61 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Miami | 60.75 | Should have won by | 9.46 | 488 | 35.11 | 0 | 0.00 | 27.00 | PLAY |
| North Carolina | 60.75 | Should have lost by | 9.46 | 389 | 25.65 | 0 | -0.38 | 22.00 | FADE |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Miami | —— | YES | YES | YES | —— | YES | YES | 3-for-11 | 7-57 |
| North Carolina | YES | —— | —— | —— | YES | —— | —— | 2-for-10 | 1-5 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Stanford | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Lower Scoring | 25 | 12.79 | 65 | 3.50 | 5.08 | 66 |
| Southern California | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Lower Scoring | -25 | -12.79 | 65 | -3.50 | 8.07 | 61 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Stanford | 57.33 | Should have lost by | 12.79 | 335 | 22.27 | 1 | 0.71 | 23.00 | BAD |
| Southern California | 57.33 | Should have won by | 12.79 | 492 | 35.06 | 1 | 1.00 | 23.00 | GOOD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Stanford | —— | —— | YES | —— | YES | —— | YES | 4-for-11 | 7-60 |
| Southern California | YES | YES | —— | YES | —— | —— | —— | 5-for-9 | 8-93 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Minnesota | Lost ATS | Better than predicted | Lower Scoring | -3 | -6.21 | 73 | -3.50 | 5.07 | 75 |
| Fresno State | Won ATS | Worse than predicted | Lower Scoring | 3 | 6.21 | 73 | 3.50 | 5.56 | 62 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Minnesota | 50.09 | Should have won by | 6.21 | 380 | 28.15 | 3 | 3.00 | 24.00 | PLAY |
| Fresno State | 50.09 | Should have lost by | 6.21 | 345 | 21.94 | 2 | 1.71 | 21.00 | FADE |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Minnesota | YES | YES | YES | —— | —— | YES | YES | 9-for-15 | 7-65 |
| Fresno State | —— | —— | —— | YES | YES | —— | —— | 3-for-10 | 6-45 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Charleston Southern | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Higher Scoring | 62 | 60.35 | 82 | 36.00 | 3.81 | 70 |
| South Carolina | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Higher Scoring | -62 | -60.35 | 82 | -36.00 | 11.23 | 69 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Charleston Southern | 85.85 | Should have lost by | 60.35 | 267 | 12.75 | 3 | 0.00 | 14.00 | BAD |
| South Carolina | 85.85 | Should have won by | 60.35 | 775 | 73.10 | 2 | 2.00 | 29.00 | GOOD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Charleston Southern | —— | —— | YES | —— | YES | —— | —— | 6-for-17 | 2-14 |
| South Carolina | YES | YES | —— | YES | —— | YES | YES | 4-for-7 | 3-35 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Southern | Won ATS | Worse than predicted | Lower Scoring | 31 | 50.25 | 79 | 41.00 | 4.45 | 58 |
| Memphis | Lost ATS | Better than predicted | Lower Scoring | -31 | -50.25 | 79 | -41.00 | 8.21 | 70 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Southern | 69.16 | Should have lost by | 50.25 | 258 | 9.45 | 0 | -3.42 | 14.00 | FADE |
| Memphis | 69.16 | Should have won by | 50.25 | 575 | 59.71 | 1 | 1.00 | 23.00 | PLAY |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Southern | —— | —— | —— | —— | YES | —— | —— | 5-for-13 | 5-26 |
| Memphis | YES | YES | YES | YES | —— | YES | YES | 8-for-16 | 6-44 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Kennesaw State | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Higher Scoring | 3 | -4.50 | 49 | 4.50 | 5.02 | 87 |
| Kent State | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Higher Scoring | -3 | 4.50 | 49 | -4.50 | 5.71 | 59 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Kennesaw State | 53.22 | Should have won by | 4.50 | 437 | 28.86 | 2 | 1.63 | 23.00 | GOOD |
| Kent State | 53.22 | Should have lost by | 4.50 | 337 | 24.36 | 2 | 2.00 | 16.00 | BAD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Kennesaw State | —— | YES | YES | —— | YES | YES | YES | 9-for-22 | 6-72 |
| Kent State | YES | —— | —— | YES | —— | —— | —— | 6-for-15 | 7-70 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Western Carolina | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Higher Scoring | 41 | 50.71 | 41 | 40.50 | 2.30 | 46 |
| NC State | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Higher Scoring | -41 | -50.71 | 41 | -40.50 | 6.28 | 86 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Western Carolina | 57.39 | Should have lost by | 50.71 | 106 | 3.34 | 1 | -2.38 | 6.00 | BAD |
| NC State | 57.39 | Should have won by | 50.71 | 540 | 54.05 | 0 | 0.00 | 32.00 | GOOD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Western Carolina | —— | —— | —— | —— | YES | —— | —— | 2-for-13 | 8-55 |
| NC State | YES | YES | YES | YES | —— | YES | YES | 6-for-14 | 3-29 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Fordham | Won ATS | Worse than predicted | Lower Scoring | 28 | 38.10 | 86 | 29.50 | 4.53 | 72 |
| Ball State | Lost ATS | Better than predicted | Lower Scoring | -28 | -38.10 | 86 | -29.50 | 7.99 | 75 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Fordham | 70.54 | Should have lost by | 38.10 | 326 | 16.22 | 2 | -0.46 | 17.00 | FADE |
| Ball State | 70.54 | Should have won by | 38.10 | 599 | 54.32 | 2 | 2.00 | 29.00 | PLAY |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Fordham | —— | —— | —— | —— | YES | —— | YES | 6-for-15 | 6-63 |
| Ball State | YES | YES | YES | YES | —— | YES | —— | 3-for-8 | 8-68 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Tennessee Tech | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Lower Scoring | 31 | 18.99 | 65 | 37.00 | 4.03 | 70 |
| Miami (Ohio) | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Lower Scoring | -31 | -18.99 | 65 | -37.00 | 6.02 | 58 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Tennessee Tech | 47.81 | Should have lost by | 18.99 | 282 | 14.41 | 3 | -0.08 | 22.00 | GOOD |
| Miami (Ohio) | 47.81 | Should have won by | 18.99 | 349 | 33.40 | 1 | 1.00 | 14.00 | BAD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Tennessee Tech | —— | —— | YES | —— | YES | YES | —— | 2-for-11 | 6-50 |
| Miami (Ohio) | YES | YES | —— | YES | —— | —— | YES | 6-for-13 | 10-95 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Southern Illinois | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Lower Scoring | -25 | -7.15 | 65 | 6.00 | 7.17 | 70 |
| Massachusetts | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Lower Scoring | 25 | 7.15 | 65 | -6.00 | 4.34 | 74 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Southern Illinois | 56.34 | Should have won by | 7.15 | 502 | 31.75 | 1 | 0.50 | 21.00 | GOOD |
| Massachusetts | 56.34 | Should have lost by | 7.15 | 321 | 24.59 | 2 | 2.00 | 15.00 | BAD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Southern Illinois | YES | YES | —— | YES | YES | YES | —— | 5-for-11 | 3-23 |
| Massachusetts | —— | —— | YES | —— | —— | —— | YES | 6-for-17 | 10-69 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Eastern Illinois | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Higher Scoring | 52 | 50.84 | 52 | 36.50 | 2.07 | 56 |
| Indiana | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Higher Scoring | -52 | -50.84 | 52 | -36.50 | 7.40 | 75 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Eastern Illinois | 57.54 | Should have lost by | 50.84 | 116 | 3.35 | 0 | -3.04 | 5.00 | BAD |
| Indiana | 57.54 | Should have won by | 50.84 | 555 | 54.19 | 0 | 0.00 | 26.00 | GOOD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Eastern Illinois | —— | —— | —— | —— | YES | —— | —— | 2-for-16 | 6-39 |
| Indiana | YES | YES | YES | YES | —— | YES | YES | 10-for-16 | 6-45 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Richmond | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Higher Scoring | 32 | 27.65 | 58 | 33.50 | 5.20 | 70 |
| Boston College | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Higher Scoring | -32 | -27.65 | 58 | -33.50 | 7.85 | 66 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Richmond | 66.85 | Should have lost by | 27.65 | 364 | 19.60 | 2 | -0.79 | 20.00 | GOOD |
| Boston College | 66.85 | Should have won by | 27.65 | 518 | 47.25 | 0 | 0.00 | 24.00 | BAD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Richmond | —— | —— | YES | —— | YES | —— | —— | 4-for-13 | 7-35 |
| Boston College | YES | YES | —— | YES | —— | YES | YES | 6-for-11 | 2-10 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Grambling State | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Higher Scoring | 6 | 10.91 | 34 | 30.00 | 5.00 | 91 |
| Louisiana Tech | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Higher Scoring | -6 | -10.91 | 34 | -30.00 | 5.91 | 66 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Grambling State | 59.91 | Should have lost by | 10.91 | 455 | 24.50 | 1 | -1.50 | 32.00 | GOOD |
| Louisiana Tech | 59.91 | Should have won by | 10.91 | 390 | 35.41 | 0 | 0.00 | 20.00 | BAD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Grambling State | —— | YES | YES | —— | YES | YES | YES | 7-for-16 | 1-15 |
| Louisiana Tech | YES | —— | —— | YES | —— | —— | —— | 4-for-12 | 6-38 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Murray State | Won ATS | Worse than predicted | Lower Scoring | 46 | 52.39 | 80 | 49.50 | 4.73 | 60 |
| Georgia | Lost ATS | Better than predicted | Lower Scoring | -46 | -52.39 | 80 | -49.50 | 8.63 | 65 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Murray State | 73.34 | Should have lost by | 52.39 | 284 | 10.48 | 2 | -2.13 | 11.00 | FADE |
| Georgia | 73.34 | Should have won by | 52.39 | 561 | 62.87 | 2 | 2.00 | 25.00 | PLAY |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Murray State | —— | —— | —— | —— | YES | —— | —— | 6-for-16 | 5-40 |
| Georgia | YES | YES | YES | YES | —— | YES | YES | 8-for-10 | 5-40 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Western Illinois | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Higher Scoring | 25 | 35.76 | 51 | 14.50 | 3.31 | 65 |
| Colorado State | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Higher Scoring | -25 | -35.76 | 51 | -14.50 | 8.48 | 69 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Western Illinois | 58.31 | Should have lost by | 35.76 | 215 | 11.27 | 1 | -0.21 | 12.00 | BAD |
| Colorado State | 58.31 | Should have won by | 35.76 | 585 | 47.04 | 2 | 2.00 | 25.00 | GOOD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Western Illinois | —— | —— | —— | —— | YES | —— | —— | 4-for-16 | 8-35 |
| Colorado State | YES | YES | YES | YES | —— | YES | YES | 8-for-14 | 8-97 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Northern Colorado | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Higher Scoring | 42 | 41.36 | 76 | 44.00 | 5.07 | 70 |
| Washington State | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Higher Scoring | -42 | -41.36 | 76 | -44.00 | 10.42 | 57 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Northern Colorado | 77.59 | Should have lost by | 41.36 | 355 | 18.12 | 4 | 0.33 | 21.00 | GOOD |
| Washington State | 77.59 | Should have won by | 41.36 | 594 | 59.48 | 1 | 1.00 | 25.00 | BAD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Northern Colorado | —— | —— | YES | —— | YES | —— | YES | 7-for-14 | 12-65 |
| Washington State | YES | YES | —— | YES | —— | YES | —— | 2-for-5 | 8-85 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Gardner Webb | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Higher Scoring | 39 | 42.62 | 57 | 30.50 | 3.26 | 57 |
| East Carolina | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Higher Scoring | -39 | -42.62 | 57 | -30.50 | 7.00 | 82 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Gardner Webb | 60.73 | Should have lost by | 42.62 | 186 | 9.06 | 2 | -0.54 | 13.00 | BAD |
| East Carolina | 60.73 | Should have won by | 42.62 | 574 | 51.67 | 1 | 1.00 | 31.00 | GOOD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Gardner Webb | —— | —— | —— | —— | YES | —— | —— | 4-for-13 | 4-41 |
| East Carolina | YES | YES | YES | YES | —— | YES | YES | 7-for-12 | 7-40 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Maine | Won ATS | Worse than predicted | Higher Scoring | 8 | 9.78 | 44 | 8.50 | 5.16 | 69 |
| Georgia Southern | Lost ATS | Better than predicted | Higher Scoring | -8 | -9.78 | 44 | -8.50 | 7.90 | 58 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Maine | 56.75 | Should have lost by | 9.78 | 356 | 23.48 | 2 | 1.29 | 17.00 | FADE |
| Georgia Southern | 56.75 | Should have won by | 9.78 | 458 | 33.26 | 1 | 1.00 | 16.00 | PLAY |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Maine | —— | —— | YES | —— | —— | YES | —— | 4-for-16 | 6-40 |
| Georgia Southern | YES | YES | —— | YES | YES | —— | YES | 3-for-13 | 7-67 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| North Carolina A&T | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Higher Scoring | 32 | 38.67 | 58 | 27.00 | 4.61 | 54 |
| Duke | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Higher Scoring | -32 | -38.67 | 58 | -27.00 | 6.38 | 90 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| North Carolina A&T | 63.12 | Should have lost by | 38.67 | 249 | 12.23 | 2 | -0.25 | 10.00 | BAD |
| Duke | 63.12 | Should have won by | 38.67 | 574 | 50.89 | 2 | 2.00 | 31.00 | GOOD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| North Carolina A&T | —— | —— | —— | —— | YES | —— | —— | 2-for-14 | 3-25 |
| Duke | YES | YES | YES | YES | —— | YES | YES | 6-for-16 | 9-97 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Furman | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Lower Scoring | 6 | 4.44 | 90 | 6.50 | 8.03 | 67 |
| Georgia State | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Lower Scoring | -6 | -4.44 | 90 | -6.50 | 7.45 | 76 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Furman | 76.38 | Should have lost by | 4.44 | 538 | 35.97 | 1 | 0.46 | 26.00 | GOOD |
| Georgia State | 76.38 | Should have won by | 4.44 | 566 | 40.41 | 0 | 0.00 | 29.00 | BAD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Furman | —— | —— | —— | YES | —— | —— | YES | 6-for-11 | 6-49 |
| Georgia State | YES | YES | YES | —— | YES | YES | —— | 6-for-11 | 7-57 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Eastern Kentucky | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Higher Scoring | 42 | 38.85 | 42 | 21.00 | 2.92 | 59 |
| Louisville | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Higher Scoring | -42 | -38.85 | 42 | -21.00 | 9.34 | 58 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Eastern Kentucky | 54.07 | Should have lost by | 38.85 | 172 | 7.61 | 0 | -1.75 | 10.00 | BAD |
| Louisville | 54.07 | Should have won by | 38.85 | 542 | 46.46 | 1 | 1.00 | 23.00 | GOOD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Eastern Kentucky | —— | —— | YES | —— | YES | —— | YES | 6-for-17 | 7-50 |
| Louisville | YES | YES | —— | YES | —— | YES | —— | 4-for-9 | 5-30 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| McNeese State | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Higher Scoring | 42 | 45.90 | 70 | 41.50 | 4.42 | 72 |
| Oklahoma State | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Higher Scoring | -42 | -45.90 | 70 | -41.50 | 7.63 | 76 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| McNeese State | 73.09 | Should have lost by | 45.90 | 318 | 13.59 | 2 | -1.46 | 13.00 | BAD |
| Oklahoma State | 73.09 | Should have won by | 45.90 | 580 | 59.50 | 2 | 2.00 | 25.00 | GOOD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| McNeese State | —— | —— | —— | —— | YES | —— | YES | 4-for-16 | 9-64 |
| Oklahoma State | YES | YES | YES | YES | —— | YES | —— | 11-for-16 | 5-29 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Jackson State | Won ATS | Worse than predicted | Higher Scoring | 23 | 36.69 | 51 | 27.00 | 4.73 | 56 |
| South Alabama | Lost ATS | Better than predicted | Higher Scoring | -23 | -36.69 | 51 | -27.00 | 6.81 | 79 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Jackson State | 61.00 | Should have lost by | 36.69 | 265 | 12.16 | 2 | -0.25 | 18.00 | FADE |
| South Alabama | 61.00 | Should have won by | 36.69 | 538 | 48.84 | 3 | 3.00 | 29.00 | PLAY |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Jackson State | —— | —— | —— | —— | YES | —— | —— | 1-for-9 | 8-73 |
| South Alabama | YES | YES | YES | YES | —— | YES | YES | 10-for-15 | 11-101 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| South Dakota | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Higher Scoring | 56 | 58.50 | 84 | 47.00 | 5.52 | 63 |
| Oklahoma | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Higher Scoring | -56 | -58.50 | 84 | -47.00 | 10.62 | 69 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| South Dakota | 92.92 | Should have lost by | 58.50 | 348 | 17.21 | 3 | -0.92 | 19.00 | BAD |
| Oklahoma | 92.92 | Should have won by | 58.50 | 733 | 75.71 | 0 | 0.00 | 28.00 | GOOD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| South Dakota | —— | —— | —— | —— | YES | —— | —— | 1-for-11 | 7-45 |
| Oklahoma | YES | YES | YES | YES | —— | YES | YES | 7-for-10 | 12-96 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Tennessee State | Won ATS | Worse than predicted | Higher Scoring | 19 | 27.84 | 71 | 26.00 | 6.21 | 75 |
| Middle Tennessee | Lost ATS | Better than predicted | Higher Scoring | -19 | -27.84 | 71 | -26.00 | 10.41 | 58 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Tennessee State | 78.01 | Should have lost by | 27.84 | 466 | 25.08 | 2 | -0.17 | 22.00 | FADE |
| Middle Tennessee | 78.01 | Should have won by | 27.84 | 604 | 52.92 | 2 | 2.00 | 31.00 | PLAY |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Tennessee State | —— | —— | YES | —— | YES | —— | YES | 7-for-16 | 10-60 |
| Middle Tennessee | YES | YES | —— | YES | —— | YES | —— | 4-for-7 | 5-57 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Tennessee-Martin | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Higher Scoring | 45 | 49.21 | 45 | 44.50 | 3.88 | 50 |
| Florida | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Higher Scoring | -45 | -49.21 | 45 | -44.50 | 7.34 | 74 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Tennessee-Martin | 64.27 | Should have lost by | 49.21 | 194 | 7.53 | 1 | -2.71 | 8.00 | BAD |
| Florida | 64.27 | Should have won by | 49.21 | 543 | 56.74 | 0 | 0.00 | 26.00 | GOOD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Tennessee-Martin | —— | —— | —— | —— | YES | —— | —— | 5-for-14 | 5-45 |
| Florida | YES | YES | YES | YES | —— | YES | YES | 9-for-13 | 3-30 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Stony Brook | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Higher Scoring | 55 | 53.52 | 69 | 31.50 | 3.60 | 73 |
| Utah State | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Higher Scoring | -55 | -53.52 | 69 | -31.50 | 8.24 | 87 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Stony Brook | 78.07 | Should have lost by | 53.52 | 263 | 12.28 | 1 | -1.63 | 16.00 | BAD |
| Utah State | 78.07 | Should have won by | 53.52 | 717 | 65.80 | 1 | 1.00 | 35.00 | GOOD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Stony Brook | —— | —— | —— | —— | YES | —— | —— | 5-for-17 | 10-88 |
| Utah State | YES | YES | YES | YES | —— | YES | YES | 10-for-14 | 9-80 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Prairie View A&M | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Lower Scoring | 20 | 25.29 | 54 | 36.00 | 4.42 | 72 |
| Houston | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Lower Scoring | -20 | -25.29 | 54 | -36.00 | 5.51 | 69 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Prairie View A&M | 52.43 | Should have lost by | 25.29 | 318 | 13.57 | 1 | -2.00 | 16.00 | GOOD |
| Houston | 52.43 | Should have won by | 25.29 | 380 | 38.86 | 2 | 2.00 | 20.00 | BAD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Prairie View A&M | —— | —— | YES | —— | YES | —— | —— | 5-for-17 | 11-98 |
| Houston | YES | YES | —— | YES | —— | YES | YES | 5-for-13 | 5-60 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Northern Arizona | Won ATS | Worse than predicted | Lower Scoring | 24 | 36.66 | 106 | 28.00 | 5.89 | 75 |
| Arizona | Lost ATS | Better than predicted | Lower Scoring | -24 | -36.66 | 106 | -28.00 | 9.73 | 74 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Northern Arizona | 87.09 | Should have lost by | 36.66 | 442 | 25.22 | 2 | -0.33 | 28.00 | FADE |
| Arizona | 87.09 | Should have won by | 36.66 | 720 | 61.87 | 0 | 0.00 | 31.00 | PLAY |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Northern Arizona | —— | —— | YES | —— | YES | —— | —— | 9-for-15 | 4-15 |
| Arizona | YES | YES | —— | YES | —— | YES | YES | 9-for-14 | 11-127 |